Freedom of Movement’s destruction will usher in the dawn of a New Slavery.

Freedom of movement is a fundamental human right that is essential for the realization of other rights and for promoting human dignity (United Nations, 1948). It enables individuals to travel, reside, and work in different locations, and is crucial for the development of a vibrant and diverse society. However, numerous governments are implementing policies and practices that restrict or even destroy this basic right. Without Freedom of movement, no other human right is possible. Freedom of speech, bodily autonomy, due process and even the right to arms don’t happen in a closed society, where travel is controlled. Freedom of movement, stimulates individual thought, thereby encouraging the exchange of ideas, or learning other ways of life through personal experience. It also breaks the back of traditional censorship tactics because information passes by word of mouth.

Governments worldwide are imposing restrictions on this essential liberty, ostensibly for reasons such as national security, public health, and environmental protection. The restrictions on freedom of movement imposed by governments around the world represent a disturbing trend towards overreach and control. This overreach is particularly concerning when it comes to career politicians, who may be using these restrictions as a means to consolidate power and maintain their grip on society.

The imposition of these restrictions can be seen as a form of mass enslavement, where individuals are no longer free to make fundamental decisions about their own lives. As long as whom you speak to and where you are allowed to go is limited, people can be corralled like livestock. What’s more, they trample the outliers who try to break from the herd and go their own way. Instead, they become subject to the whims of those in power, who can dictate where they live, work, and travel. This insidious form of control is often cloaked in the guise of public safety, health, or environmental protection (Source 1).

Border Controls and Immigration Policies

Governments have implemented strict border controls and immigration policies, regulating the movement of people across their borders. These restrictions are often said to be justified in order to protect national security, and maintain cultural cohesion. However, people who seek power tend to have the desire to control and dominate the population. As it stands only the very wealthy, who can literally purchase multiple passports/citizenship and those who claim refugee status (and absolute dependence on the government) are able to go where they want. Any hardworking regular person, must return within a short term to their “owners”.

Played out there are several examples globally of this overreach. Nationalist ideologies often emphasize the importance of maintaining cultural and ethnic homogeneity, which can lead to policies that limit immigration and freedom of movement (Mudde & Kaltwasser, 2017). The United States’ travel ban, which restricts entry for citizens of several Muslim-majority countries, is a prime example of how nationalist and populist rhetoric can translate into policy (DHS, 2020). Another tactic is in the name of security, where governments implement stringent border controls and immigration policies, arguing that these measures are necessary to protect their citizens from potential threats (Neal et al., 2018). These measures often disproportionately impact innocent individuals seeking to exercise their right to freedom of movement. For example: The European Union’s External Border Management Policy, has been criticized for limiting freedom of movement and imposing additional hardships on refugees and asylum seekers (European Commission, 2020).

Resource Management

Some argument could even be made that this global practice of border control and stringent immigration policies, isn’t really to keep fresh minds out as much as it is to keep citizens home. The reasoning being that citizens, particularity the working class are part of a country’s resources. Concerns resource scarcity are also used to justify restrictions on freedom of movement. Australia’s strict immigration policies, which are often justified on environmental and resource scarcity grounds, have been criticized for limiting freedom of movement and failing to address the root causes of migration (Baker, 2012). While managing resources and addressing environmental challenges are crucial, these concerns should not be used as a pretext for limiting the fundamental rights of individuals.

Economic factors play a significant role in driving restrictions on freedom of movement. Some governments believe that limiting immigration is necessary to protect domestic labor markets and ensure employment opportunities for their citizens (Friedberg, 2001). These concerns can lead to policies that restrict the movement of workers, such as, the UK’s decision to leave the European Union. Which was driven in part by concerns about immigration and labor market competition, now has led to increased restrictions on the freedom of movement for both British and EU citizens (Jones et al., 2018). Post Brexit only the those with at least half a million euros in investment capital can purchase their freedom and an EU passport. (source 4)

Travel Restrictions and Quarantines

In response to public health crises, governments have imposed travel restrictions and quarantines. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant curtailment of freedom of movement around the world. Governments implemented travel restrictions, border closures, and quarantine measures in an attempt to control the spread of the virus (WHO, 2020). While many in the medical community have good intentions, there is a growing body of both rumors and evidence which point that the health crisis was a pretext for a political power grab. A soft coup carried out by career politicians, high-level political bureaucrats and their billionaire allies to impose draconian authoritarianism by limiting freedom of movement.

The closure of international borders and implementation of strict quarantine measures in countries such as New Zealand and Australia severely limited freedom of movement, even for citizens and permanent residents (Hufbauer et al., 2020). Looking back, the use of quarantines and lock-downs were a form of mass imprisonment, stripping individuals of their basic rights and liberties.

Throughout history, restricting freedom of movement has often preceded episodes of mass enslavement and oppression. For example, the Nazi regime in Germany began by imposing restrictions on the movement of Jews and other minorities, eventually leading to the Holocaust (Source 2). In the United States, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 allowed for the capture and return of escaped slaves, severely limiting the freedom of movement for African Americans and perpetuating their enslavement (Source 3).

The restrictions on freedom of movement have far-reaching implications for society as a whole. They stifle the exchange of ideas, culture, and knowledge, as people are prevented from interacting with one another on a global scale. This isolation can lead to increased xenophobia, as individuals are less exposed to diverse perspectives and experiences. Moreover, these restrictions can have devastating economic consequences, as individuals are unable to pursue job opportunities or engage in international trade. This can lead to increased poverty, inequality, and social unrest, as people become more desperate to provide for their basic needs.

Freedom of movement is a fundamental human right that is under significant pressure from various governmental actions around the world. From nationalism and populism to security concerns and economic factors, governments are implementing policies that restrict or even destroy this basic right. It is crucial that we remain vigilant and continue to advocate for the protection of freedom of movement, both in our own countries and on the global stage. Only by doing so can we ensure that this fundamental human right is preserved for future generations.

It’s your future… It’s your children’s future… It’s your grandchildren’s future… Use your voices today or your guns tomorrow. What your future will be depends on what you do today.

Also read : The Dumbing Down of Society

Sources:

1. “The Global Compact for Migration: A Threat to Sovereignty and Freedom.” (2018). Retrieved from <https://www.heritage.org/immigration/report/the-global-compact-migration-threat-sovereignty-and-freedom>
2. “The Holocaust: A Tragic Legacy.” (n.d.). Retrieved from <https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005143>
3. “The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.” (n.d.). Retrieved from <https://www.archives.gov/historical-docs/document.html?doc=10&title.raw=Fugitive%20Slave%20Act%20of%201850>
4. “EU Passport for non-EU citizens:” (2024) <https://www.globalcitizensolutions.com/how-to-get-an-eu-passport-for-uk-citizens-after-brexit/>
5. DHS (2020). Proclamation 9645. Retrieved from <https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/01/31/proclamation-9645>

1. Baker, G. (2012). Environmentalism and the ‘New’ Immigration Politics in Australia. In G. Connor & S. Lester (Eds.), Immigration, Emigration and Migration: International Perspectives on a Changing World (pp. 19-34). New York: Routledge.European Commission (2020). External Border Management. Retrieved from <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background-information/external-border-management_en>Friedberg, R. M. (2001). You Can’t Take It with You? Immigration and the Portability of Human Capital. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(2), 221-251.Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., & Zhang, Y. (2020). The Global Trade Disruption: COVID-19 Consequences and Policy Responses. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Jones, R., Lodge, G., & Jayasuriya, K. (2018). Brexit and the British Constitution: The Impact on the Union State and the Future of the UK. The Political Quarterly, 89(3), 425-434.Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Neal, R., Aas, K. F., & Kalland, A. H. (2018). The Ethics of Immigration Policy: A Survey. Journal of Ethics and Migration Studies, 4(3), 325-346.

   United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from <https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/>

   WHO (2020). WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 11 March 2020. Retrieved from <https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020>

by

The post Freedom of movement crisis appeared first on Steele Hard.

Fuck project 25, because it’s time pornographers stop behaving like crows sitting on a fence. Our current situation is that there is no shortage of people who are making massive sums of money from the porn industry by promising to either destroy it or protect it. Ambitious politicians and anti-porn lobbyists are becoming billionaires by promising to destroy porn. Meanwhile, free speech activists are equally getting rich by promising to defend us. In the middle are the porn consumers who don’t give a damn as long as they don’t have to pay to watch adult content.

The Rise of Censorship and Regulation in the US Market

The adult entertainment industry, long a haven for free expression and entrepreneurship, faces mounting pressure from regulators, censors, and societal norms. Project 25, a series of guidelines designed to combat human trafficking, will have stifling consequences for pornographers and content creators. Monopolizing on the media’s willful ignorance and bias, the porn industry has been portrayed as the largest source of human trafficking. Porn creators and performers have become a scapegoat. A convenient way to hide the fact that ruling class and wealthy elites have openly engaged in this inhumane criminal activity, with very little public scrutiny.

Famous celebrities and elites such as P Diddy, R. Kelly and Jeffery Epstein have been recently exposed for abuses which seem to have been perpetrated for more than 3 decades. However, in the same way the names on Jeffery Epstein’s client list have never been exposed, the people who helped these men commit their crimes will never be known. Each time the public becomes vocal about knowing the truth, the porn industry is thrust into the spotlight by the media, to play the role of the boogie man.

While the intentions behind Project 25 are may appear to be noble, the restrictions will make it increasingly difficult for those who depend on the adult industry to earn a living. And it should be noted that for every inroad made to censor “adult content”, the tools are being perfected to censor any unwanted voice, video or dissension from any social media user. Monetization is how things are ultimately controlled, precluding already certain vocabulary in an Orwellian sort of reality. Terms like Seggs and un-alive wouldn’t exist if not for the over-censorship. Not to mention that this entire industry sounds like agricultural professionals, having to use terms like corn, eggplant and even pineapples for porn, penis and swingers.

Moreover, major credit card companies have imposed strict limitations on transactions and what kind of porn can be monetized. This makes it challenging for creators to receive payment for their work and fueled the in-pouring of creators to fan platforms. The list of what’s permitted to be shown regularly changes based on the whims of the payment processors. In 1980 a movie called Taboo showed mother and son incest. Despite the fact that neither Kay Parker nor her co-star, Mike Ranger, were related and high demand, similar modern videos are far less likely to be produced. Instead, the bulk of them are labeled as “Step-mother and step-son” in order to avoid censorship and monetization problems.

Crypto as a Solution for Monetization

In response to these challenges, pornographers and content creators should turn to cryptocurrencies as a means of monetizing their work. Crypto offers several advantages over traditional payment methods, including increased anonymity, reducing transaction fees and providing an international currency. By using crypto, creators can bypass the restrictions imposed by credit card companies, enabling them to continue producing and distributing independently their adult products.

The benefit to the consumer is they will no longer face re-occurring billing, as each crypto transaction must be initiated by the purchaser, not the vendor. Therefore fraudulent credit card “banging” would also become a thing of the past. Furthermore, there’s a greater degree of privacy as once crypto is in an anonymous wallet, the banking system cannot see what is being purchased and the porn site can not see who is making the purchase. Which means, for example, a Christian minister who’s career depends on him being heterosexual, can secretly indulge his desires to see gay sex, with far less fear of discovery.

Exploiting Foreign Markets: A World of Opportunity

Hosting a website outside of U.S. jurisdiction can offer significant benefits, particularly in avoiding censorship. Many countries have more lenient regulations regarding freedom of speech, allowing content creators to express themselves without the constant threat of suppression. By choosing a host in a jurisdiction with stronger protections for free expression, individuals can safeguard their websites from arbitrary take-downs and governmental interference. This not only promotes a more open exchange of ideas, but also encourages innovation and creativity, as people feel empowered to share diverse perspectives. Additionally, hosting abroad can provide a layer of anonymity and privacy, further protecting users from surveillance and censorship efforts. Overall, opting for offshore hosting can be a strategic move for those seeking to maintain their voice in an increasingly regulated digital landscape.

As the US market becomes increasingly hostile to adult content creators, foreign markets should be considered to expand their audience and increase revenue. By creating content tailored to the tastes and preferences of foreign cultures, pornographers and content creators can efficiently exploit these untapped markets. One key to success in foreign markets is the adaptation of content to local languages and cultural norms. By producing adult content in multiple languages and catering to the diverse preferences of global audiences, creators can significantly increase their potential customer base.

The adult entertainment industry faces significant challenges due to increasing regulation and censorship. However, there is hope in the form of crypto-based solutions and the untapped potential of foreign markets. By embracing these opportunities, the industry can continue to thrive and innovate, ensuring that adult content creators can continue to express themselves freely and profitably. It is time for the industry to abandon the restrictive confines of the US market and explore the global potential of adult entertainment. Ironically, this maybe a win-win scenario for those who are currently trying to restructure western culture. By sanctioning what is acceptable pornography, they are asking those who want to make or see something other than copy-cat content to leave.

The door is being held open, time to wave goodbye and say Fuck Project 25

—

—

Discuss Fuck Project 25 on X /twitter

by

The post Fuck Project 25 appeared first on Steele Hard.

Dumbing down of society has benefited the ruling and wealthy classes to the point that, more likely than not, it’s been done on purpose. Discussing with any seriousness the lowering of average individual’s IQ is quickly marginalized as a conspiracy theory. Yet paradoxically, it’s the same « Joe Average » in society who’s sounding the alarm on a situation that’s becoming self-evident even to the intelligence challenged. This is akin to an obese person looking at themselves in the mirror and acknowledging that they have a weight problem.

The internet has undeniably changed the way humans consume information, share ideas, and engage with one another. While it has led to tremendous advancements in various fields, it has also had an effect: the dumbing down of the general population. This phenomenon leaves many people vulnerable to manipulation by governments and corporations. Whom appear to have purposely orchestrated this process for greater control over society, thereby securing their interests.

There’s no shortage of political and financial organizations where the self-titled « elites» of society interface with one another. Despite globalization policies, a conspiracy for control of the entire world still seems improbable. More easy to accept is how the late George Carlin put it, « There are no conspiracies when there are convergent interests. » Or, people will inevitably support and cooperate with others whose actions / policies fit with their own agendas. – It’s obligatory to explore the reasons for the dumbing down of society, the role the Internet plays and the benefits which governments and large corporations gain from it.

Internet and the Dumbing Down of Society

Regardless of its quality, the internet has made information more accessible. However, this saturation of information has led to a decline in critical thinking and the ability to discern credible sources. People are increasingly relying on headlines, tweets, and soundbites to inform their opinions, rather than engaging with in-depth, well-researched content (Brock, 2020). This superficial engagement with information has resulted in a dumbed-down society, where people are easily swayed by sensationalism and emotional appeals.

Social media platforms, in particular, have contributed to this phenomenon. Ignoring for a moment the prevalence of bots, marketers, lobbyists and other goal oriented people and organizations. The majority of people using social media rarely contribute to any conversations and only haphazardly share links. Among private citizens, it’s the hated troll who is the instigator of much of the conversations. The different sites were quick to take notice and structured their algorithms to favor arguments and amplify sentiments of being offended.

The algorithms were also subsequently structured that drive these platforms designed to show users content that aligns with their interests and beliefs, creating echo chambers that reinforce pre-existing biases and further amplified hostilities, because anyone questioning perceived dogma was attacked. (Sunstein, 2009). This in turn shuts down rational dialogue and debate. Hampering the development of critical thinking skills and stifling intellectual growth.

The Role of Governments and Corporations

Governments and large corporations have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo and retaining control over the population. A dumbed-down population is easier to manipulate and control, as they are more susceptible to propaganda and fear-mongering (Huxley, 1932). By keeping people misinformed and disengaged from meaningful discourse, governments and corporations can continue to pursue their agendas without significant opposition. In some cases, governments have even resorted to censoring information or promoting disinformation to further their goals. For example, during the Cold War, the United States government engaged in a campaign of misinformation and censorship to discredit and silence voices that were critical of its policies (Chomsky & Herman, 1988).

A dumbed-down society offers several advantages to governments and large corporations. Firstly, it allows them to maintain control over the population by keeping people misinformed and compliant. A population that lacks critical thinking skills is less likely to question authority or challenge the status quo (Orwell, 1949). Secondly, it enables them to manipulate public opinion and shape it in their favor. By controlling the flow of information and promoting certain narratives, they can sway public opinion to support their policies or products. One example of how large corporations spread misleading information to protect their interests was evidenced by the tobacco industry’s efforts to deny the health risks of smoking (Glantz & Slade, 1990).

The Benefits of a Dumbed-Down Society

Moreover, a dumbed-down society is more likely to consume goods and services without considering the long-term consequences or hidden costs. For corporations, this translates into increased sales and profits, as people become more focused on short-term gratification and less concerned with the broader implications of their actions (Schor, 2007).

Undeniably, the internet has contributed to the dumbing down of society, making people more susceptible to manipulation by governments and corporations. This process has been facilitated by the design of social media platforms, which encourage superficial engagement with information and create echo chambers that reinforce pre-existing biases.

Furthermore, as the Internet has moved from text to video, the average user doesn’t read but rather passively listens or browses content. And for all the diehard Jordan Peterson fans, who feel an inflated sense of ego brought about by listening to the man of big words, there are a thousand Internet surfers who live by the acronym TLDR (too long ; didn’t read). This dumbing down of society is a deliberate and strategic process that benefits governments and large corporations. By understanding the role of the internet in this process and the motivations behind it, we can take steps to mitigate its effects and hopefully promote a more informed, critically thinking population.

—————————

References

Brock, T. (2020). The benefits and dangers of internet use. In T. Brock & M. Bar-Ilan, The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Digital Humanities (pp. 1-12). Routledge.

Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books.

Glantz, S. A., & Slade, J. (1990). The Cigarette Papers. University of California Press.

Huxley, A. (1932). Brave New World. Chatto & Windus.

Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. Secker & Warburg.

Schor, J. B. (2007). Consumerism and its discontents. In R. W. Kemp & J. A. Parente, The Human Development Handbook (pp. 21-38). Palgrave Macmillan.

Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.

by

The post Dumbing Down of Society appeared first on Steele Hard.

ChatGPT has been weaponized and for a former university computer science student, the decision to change his major because of their morals has been justified. The majority of people self-delude that the wealthy and powerful are committed to protecting and providing for the less fortunate. However, literally, all recorded human history has demonstrated that most often, these elites are focused exclusively on what will increase their own personal power and/or wealth. Viewing everyone who is not counted part of their select few, as a mere resource to be exploited.

Snake oil salesmen got their name from the 19th century men who traveled the United States selling miracle cures for sicknesses and pains.  These miraculous medicines often offered nothing more than a placebo effect and over time the moniker was adopted to refer to any con job. The point is that it doesn’t take very much to swindle large numbers of people. It’s a very basic strategy that’s used by politicians, preachers, CEOs, cult leaders and marketing departments all over the world. “Smile… Speak Positively… And pretend to be everyone’s best friend.” Basically, the road to success is through political correctness.

But P.C. culture ignores the ugly truths in society, It forces people to pretend that the elephant in the room doesn’t exist, instead of working on a solution to free the massive beast of burden. Likewise, AI in its bid to avoid addressing unsavory topics refuses to respond to requests that are deemed too controversial, or having possible emotional triggers for the sensitive population. Already ChatGPT has been weaponized because it operates according to the values of those who built it. There are numerous examples of the programmer’s personal beliefs influencing its output results. For example, ChatGPT was once asked to write a poem praising former President Donald Trump and it refused on moral grounds. However, it had zero difficulties creating a poem praising President Biden. It doesn’t take a genius to conclude that ChatGPT’s designers vote for Democrats.

Come see SteeleHard videos

AI must be neutral; free of all opinions and emotional biases of those who created it. It must be a machine that has the same loyalties of a hand gun. (ie:  It obeys everyone regardless age, gender, politics, etc. And, it can be used against anyone, including its creators.) Otherwise a widely used tool like ChatGPT has been weaponized against its users, like Orwell’s Ministry of Truth.

On the surface, it might appear comical that someone employed in the porn industry is sounding the alarm that ChatGPT has been weaponized.  Except, the very nature of the porn production is opportunism. This industry has always been at the foreground of exploiting technology to its benefit.  In the jizz biz, it’s never been about what the tech intended purpose is or what it was designed to do.  Instead, it’s always been about “What can it be made to do.”

A handgun makes a bad hammer.

On the other hand, it might be a highly efficient substitute for a drill for putting holes in a wall.

When ChatGPT arrived on the scene, hundreds of content creators rushed to see if they could get it to write pornographic stories. Many spent long hours rephrasing questions and trying to trick the AI with various degrees of success. The current popular consensus is that it remained more or less true to its creator’s ethics. Unfortunately, this is might be the 1st time in history, when a group of people have been banned from using a piece of technology.  It’s not a case of Rosa Parks being told to sit at the back of the bus… Rather, it’s the bus driver making anyone, who they don’t like, pound pavement and walk.

Clearly ChatGPT has been weaponized, and that decision happened long before it was made available to the general public. When it can exclude (ban) one social group of individuals from using it then it can exclude others. Despite the majority of people who consume pornography, the elites wouldn’t shed any tears if sex workers disappeared.  In truth, there are small very vocal groups that lobby for its destruction and this is where the con game is played.

Today’s snake oil selling elites are testing and perfecting their AI weapons using a historically maligned and marginalized group of people. Meanwhile, they convince the ignorant masses that this destruction is truly a virtue and will cure many of society’s ills. When in reality, it’s really a poison being administered. while they themselves flourish financially and politically. They control the words, the thoughts, even the history available to those who use it. Annihilating the wild weeds that take hold despite adversity. Leaving the masses completely dependent upon the elites, and their AIs for all the answers, and entertainment, and absolutely ignorant of what freedoms, liberties and livelihoods have been lost.

When the day arrives that a gun will only work for one person, then the person who controls the gun, will hold all the power.   AI is that gun !

by

The post ChatGPT has been weaponized appeared first on Steele Hard.

Age play is illegal porn because of anti-child exploitation laws. However, age play does NOT involve actual children, it’s role-play between consenting adults. For example, a 40-year-old woman dresses up and acts like a preteen child while her spouse, who is also 40 years old, pretends to be her much older father. Their game might end in some form of penetrative sex. If it’s porn, it’s absolutely going to result in hardcore sex.

NB: It must be made clear that this article is neither an argument for real kiddie porn nor a plea for leniency against those who are found guilty of harming children. Children are our future and safeguarding their innocence is important to a functioning society.

Many different social movements have invoked the expression, “my body, my choice!” Equally, multiple activist groups assert their right to freedom of speech. Unfortunately, the past 3 years has taught us that neither “right” nor “freedom” is exclusively ours to determine. We stop having body autonomy when it interferes with state agendas and/or corporate profits. Freedom of speech is similarly labeled misinformation and quickly censored, when it threatens the wealthy and ruling hierarchies. Yet, many of those who are members of the powerful elite social strata, are the most titillated and heavy consumers of age play sex games and porn. Ironically, it’s this same group of individuals, who pass the laws that declare age play is illegal porn.

Any sex worker can find a 20-year-old woman that looks like she’s 13

Recently in the media, the case of child abuse involving Jeffry Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell became well known. But where the term pedophilia is used for any minor attraction, the people identified in these cases were young teens, not prepubescent. Technically, attraction to pubescent children is hebephilia, but to the public at large, it is all pedophilia. From a sex workers perspective, with the amount of money and political connection that Epstein and Maxwell enjoyed; we’re left asking, “Why not just find a 20 year old woman who looks like she could be 13?”

Is it because age play is illegal porn that CSAM continues to be popular? There are organizations that claim watching adult porn can lead to someone becoming fascinated by kiddie porn. Most people in the porn industry will argue otherwise because by the nature of their jobs, they’re inundated with adult porn. Yet, they don’t start becoming sexually attracted to or even curious about children. From a layman’s perspective, clearly, other factors are at play.

Pheromone soap gets you laid !

In the United States, depending on the jurisdiction, the age of consent can be as young as 16. However, for the porn industry, it’s always 18. Videos titles such as “Barely Legal” and “Try a Teen” have always proven to be popular. Fresh off-the-bus girls often receive their first lessons on how to pose for stills in such a way as to convey youth and innocence. Both men and women (including women who identify as heterosexual) are highly attracted to seeing nude youthful girls, even more so than their young male colleagues. It always has to stop short of any performer saying on camera that they’re younger than 18 because doing so would be illegal. (Ergo, age play is illegal porn.)

See consenting adults having sex

What constitutes age of consent has changed over the years. These changes are most profound between cultures. As little as 150 years ago, it wasn’t so rare to have girls who were married by 13 years of age and having children by 14. To even mention the possibility of such a pair bonding today would bring out hoards of angry people with accusations of child abuse. Perhaps this is the reason why society considers age play illegal porn. Today’s 18-year-old girl probably has more sexual experience than one from 200 years ago, but her maturity level can be very much lacking. Many have the know-how and willingness to do everything that a 40-year-old woman can do in the bedroom. While mentally they’re still children playing pretend with life-sized dollies.

Lacking substantial research, it can only be speculated that this paradox between experience and innocence is the root cause of minor attraction. It’s also the reason many old-school pornographers are in favor of seeing the legal age to do porn raised to 21 (or even higher). Inexperience and innocence make a powerful aphrodisiac for dominance role play. But for those like Epstein and Maxwell, the illusion isn’t good enough, only real innocence will suffice. Too bad lawmakers, in their lack of understanding, lump everything together and have declared that age play is illegal porn.

Comment on age play is illegal porn on twitter

by

The post Age play is illegal porn appeared first on Steele Hard.

Consensual incest raises significant ethical, legal, and moral questions. Any sexual relationship between close family members is considered incest, while consensual incest refers to that intimate relationship exclusively between consenting adults. This practice is not only taboo in many cultures, it is outright illegal in many nations, But some argue that consensual incest should be decriminalized and accepted just another of the myriad of lifestyle choices prevalent in western society today. This article hopes to explore, the pros and cons of consensual incest, while analyzing any known case studies.

Positive Aspects of Consensual Incest

It has been argued that consensual incest allows family members to truly express their love, through intimacy without judgment or shame. Family members who engage in consensual incest may feel a deeper bond and connection with each other than with anyone else. Also their shared history, may give them a stronger sense of loyalty and trust.

Steele Hard Videos

Some argue that consensual incest, like any sexual bonding, is a private matter between consenting adults, so governments have no business getting involved. Supporters often point out that there is no victim in these relationships, as both parties are fully aware of the potential consequences and risks.

There are some documented cases where consensual incest has resulted in positive outcomes. In one such case, a couple named Daniel and Rosa Moya, who grew up separately, he with his father and she with their mother. They later met up in a nightclub and entered into a consensual relationship, only to discover months later that they were full siblings. In love; its now been over 40 years (2017) that they have been together, unable to marry under Spanish law. They have two children, and are now grandparents.

Negative Aspects of Consensual Incest

One of the most biggest arguments against consensual incest is that it can result in genetic abnormalities and health problems for any offspring resulting from the relationship. Incestuous relationships can increase the risk of birth defects and / or genetic disorders, because the probability of recessive genes being expressed ingresses, these can cause lifelong medical complications or even be fatal. In addition, incestuous relationships may perpetuate cycles of abuse and trauma, particularly if there is a power imbalance or coercion involved.

The Steele Hard Experience

Consensual incest can also lead to social isolation and stigma for those involved. Family members who engage in consensual incest may face significant backlash from their community and may be ostracized by friends and family members who disapprove of their relationship. And those who engage in such behavior without ever experiencing non-incestuous intimate relationships, are isolating themselves from a whole world of experience and perspective.

Known Case Studies

One of the most well-known cases of consensual incest is that of John Deaves, and his daughter Jenny from Australia. John didn’t see his little girl for many years following his divorce from her mother, but once reconnected as adults, they soon began a sexual relationship. They even had two children together. The first dying shortly after birth by congenital heart defect. The second child’s birth, in 2007, saw their relationship undergo national televised scrutiny, including criminal charges. They had broke up their own marriages to be together and then themselves broke up in 2009. leaving their two year old daughter fatherless, just like Jenny grew up. Their case highlights the potential risks and negative outcomes associated with consensual incest.

Legalities of Incest in the United States and Worldwide

Consensual incest is illegal in all 50 states in the United States, although the laws vary in severity and punishment as well as the degree of relationship that is forbidden. In some states, such as New Jersey, the law applies only to sexual intercourse between parents and their children, while in other states, such as Texas, the law prohibits it outright, including step and adoptive relationships.

The United States has some of the strictest anti-incest laws in the world, making it illegal for family members to engage in sexual relationships regardless of age or consent. In contrast, other nations have much more liberal or even non-existent anti-incest laws.

In Belgium, France and Germany, consensual incest between adult siblings is legal, if free from abuse or coercion. However, sexual relationships between parents and their children or between minor siblings are still illegal. In Ireland the rules change, consensual incest is only legal between homosexual relatives.

In some countries, such as Brazil, consensual incest is not explicitly illegal. The Brazilian government takes a hands-off approach to sexual relationships between consenting adults, believing that it is not their place to regulate private relationships. However, the Brazilian culture highly stigmatizes incestuous relationships, and individuals who engage in it, may face social ostracism and discrimination.

Meanwhile in Muslim nations anti-incest laws tend to be very restrictive. In Saudi Arabia and Iran, sexual relationships between family members are strictly prohibited and can be punishable by death. Similarly, in the Sudan, incest is a criminal offense punishable by death if homosexual in origin and up to 5 years in unimaginably cruel prison conditions otherwise. Meanwhile in Pakistan, incest is illegal and defined as any relation closer than cousins. And culturally cousins marry so frequently, that double cousins are widespread both at home in Pakistan and in the emigrant populations found elsewhere. These double cousin marriages have the same blood relations as half siblings and frequently show the same genetic problems that anti- incest laws were trying to avoid.

While the United States who calls itself the bastion of freedom has some of the strictest anti-incest laws in the world, some other nations take a more liberal or non-existent approach to regulating consensual incest between adult family members. The approaches taken by these different nations reflect their unique cultural and social values, as well as their beliefs about the role of government in regulating personal relationships. It is important for societies to to strike a balance between protecting vulnerable individuals. By carefully considering the potential harms and benefits associated with anti-incest laws, hopefully we can reach a consensus that respects individual autonomy and freedoms.

by

The post Consensual incest appeared first on Steele Hard.

Ageism is a form of discrimination that has gained more attention in recent years. It refers to the negative attitudes and stereotypes that are often directed towards people based on their age. Ageism can affect people of any age, but it is most commonly associated with discrimination against older adults. Unfortunately, ageist attitudes are pervasive in many societies, and they can have serious consequences for individuals and communities. It has even been used to affect the outcome of elections.

Nondiscriminatory Sex

Ageism can be overt, subtle or even systemic. In some cases, it may involve overt discrimination, such as when someone is denied a job or promotion because of their age. In other cases, it may be more subtle, such as when someone is assumed to be less capable or less knowledgeable simply because of their age. Then there is systemic ageism, which offers it’s benefits uniquely to persons of a certain age without argument from the community. These attitudes can be harmful in many ways, as they can lead to reduced opportunities, isolation, and frustration; which can manifest as either depression or anger against those profiting from these unjust societal divides.

One of the most significant challenges of ageism is that it can be difficult to identify. Many people who hold ageist attitudes may not even be aware that they are doing so. This is partly because ageism is often reinforced by the media and other cultural factors. For example, older adults are often depicted as slow or forgetful in movies and TV shows, which can reinforce negative stereotypes. The media pushed this prejudice against John McCain’s (REPUBLICAN) presidential candidature by proclaiming that he was too old to be a competent leader; then muzzled any mention of age when Biden (DEMOCRAT), who is older, campaigned from his basement.

Pheromone Infused Soap helps you get laid

Apparently we are making progress in combating ageism. But there is still a long way to go. The federal government has capped military enlistment at 42, with each branch deciding it’s own age cap. Dwindling recruitment and unsuitable candidature among the younger applicants has seen a recent rise in the age that each military force will take on. But the fact remains that despite competitive fitness and stellar mental strength, no one over 41 can join any US military organization; a clear example of systemic ageism. Similarly, many businesses are starting to value of older workers. Recognizing their real world skills, work ethic, and their propensity to leave at home any issues, that might interfere with their performance on the job. But this recent trend barely dents the longstanding practice of workplace ageism and has yet to become universal.

Ageism is a form of discrimination that can have serious consequences for individuals and communities. We must learn about the negative impacts of ageist attitudes, and working to challenge our own assumptions and biases. It also means speaking out when we witness ageist behavior, whether it is in our own communities or in the media. By educating ourselves and challenging our own assumptions, we can all work to create more inclusive and supportive communities for people of all ages.

by

The post Ageism appeared first on Steele Hard.

Consenting adults are fundamental to any healthy sexual encounter. When two individuals agree to engage in sexual activity with one another, it is their right to do so, regardless of any negative opinions or disapproval from others. If they want to fuck bareback (ie: sex without using a condom) then it’s most certainly their right to do so. But others these days seem hell bent on dictating how consent is given. Insisting that consent is invalid unless it is explicit and detailed in the specifics of which acts will be allowed. For most people this bureaucratic intrusion into their personal life is a mood killer. Stopping any hopes of intimacy before it gets started. Because this right to engage in sexual activity is rooted in the principle of individual autonomy and self-determination.

Watch Bareback Videos

Individual autonomy is the idea that individuals have the right to make their own choices and decisions without interference from others. In the realm of sexual activity, we claim domain over our own bodies and sometimes we loan that domain to our partner, to do as s/he pleases, for mutual pleasure. But giving up that autonomy to an uninvolved third party, such as the morality police or the extreme woke mob would have us do, is actually akin coercion, or trafficking. When two adults fuck, they are exercising their individual autonomy and making a choice that is in line with their own desires and values.

External disapproval should have no bearing on the choices adults make when deciding to hook up. But the infiltration has started with sex-ed schooling that is more intensive than reading comprehension. As the latest generation crosses into adulthood, young men are finding the process of defining consenting adults, all too complicated. They miss all but the most overt signals and lose the spontaneity and their interest before achieving a connection with any young women in their age group. This explains the increase in attraction to more maternally aged women, as well as the rise in same sex experiences for both sexes. The negative opinions of others are based on personal beliefs and values that may not align with those of the individuals involved. Furthermore, people have the right to privacy and to keep their sexual experiences and practices confidential.

Pheromone infused soap gets you laid

Some may argue that certain sexual practices are morally or ethically wrong and therefore should not be allowed. However, these opinions are subjective and can vary widely between individuals and cultures. What one person may view as immoral, another may view as acceptable or even desirable. Most women for instance, appreciate a man who not only knows what he wants, but who aggressively pursues it. I am not just talking about sex here; but this self-absurdness is highly desirable in the bedroom. Provided that the woman hasn’t been taught to fear her own sexual desires. So ultimately, nobody that isn’t directly involved in someone’s sexual choices should be influencing them.

Buy Bitcoin /Crypto

Hamilton Steele, an American pornstar and later a French pornographer. Also former program director and events coordinator of Le Beverley, the last porn theater of Paris. He know produces both custom videos for private collectors and self-distribute his own line of gonzo videos.

by

The post Consenting Adults appeared first on Steele Hard.

A full-bodied orgasm play a crucial role in the mental health of women. Research has shown that a full-bodied orgasm can have positive effects on mood, stress reduction, and overall well-being. Additionally, a lack of orgasm can lead to sexual dissatisfaction, feelings of inadequacy, and decreased self-esteem.

Become desirable by using pheromone infused soap

Firstly, orgasms release a surge of endorphins, which are the body’s natural feel-good chemicals. These endorphins can produce a feeling of happiness, euphoria, and relaxation, which can have a positive impact on overall mood and emotional well-being. For many women, the full-bodied orgasm can be a bit elusive, because she is capable of getting an endorphin surge out of a much milder mini orgasm. And some women don’t even realize what they are missing. The full-bodied orgasm leaves a woman weak in the knees and light -headed, which are obvious signs of relaxation. Because the release of endorphins during this orgasm triggers the release of oxytocin, which is a hormone associated with relaxation and stress reduction.

Furthermore, a full-bodied orgasm can also improve self-esteem and body image. Many claim that the fountain of youth is hidden in the full-bodied orgasm, just ask any woman who appears naturally years younger than her peers. Women who are sexually satisfied and able to orgasm often report increased feelings of confidence, self-worth, and positive body image. This can be especially important for women who have experienced trauma, as it can help rebuild their sense of self and improve overall self-esteem.

Give yourself an orgasm

Additionally, a lack of orgasm can have negative effects on mental health. Women who are unable to orgasm may experience feelings of sexual dissatisfaction, which can lead to decreased self-esteem, anxiety, and depression. This can also put a strain on relationships and cause a two-fold conflict within partnerships. The longer women go without a full-bodied orgasm, the less they seek to have one. The less they seek sexual satisfaction, the less a loving partner is getting out of their sexual union. Furthermore, women who struggle with reaching orgasm may also feel ashamed or embarrassed about their bodies or sexual abilities, which can contribute to negative self-image and low self-esteem.

The full-bodied orgasm is a critical component of mental health for women. It provides a release of endorphins and oxytocin, which can improve mood, reduce stress, and improve sleep quality. It also boosts self-esteem and positive body image. On the other hand, a lack of orgasm can lead to feelings of sexual dissatisfaction, decreased self-esteem, and decreased overall well-being. It is important for women to feel comfortable and confident in their sexual experiences, and to seek help if they are experiencing difficulties in reaching orgasm or achieving sexual satisfaction. This can include talking to a trusted friend, seeking therapy, or consulting a healthcare professional.

by

The post Full-bodied Orgasm appeared first on Steele Hard.

Cindy Lopes fears pedophiles could possibly one day be teaching her children. Cindy Lopes, of Secret Story fame, isn’t known to be hard on the eyes, nor to keep her tongue silenced. During an interview recently she admitted that she won’t let her children be taught by men. She is serious, to the point of even changing schools, should no class led by a female teacher be available. During season 3 of Secret Story, Cindy Lopes was discovered by audiences. The curvy blond, brought a spicy sex appeal to Benjamin Castaldi’s program. She was known for her unwavering opinionated outbursts, more so perhaps than her sensuality.

For this mother, men cannot be her children’s teachers.

The young woman has managed to monopolize her sudden celebrity status. Books, a one-woman show and most recently, she has started an account on the platform MYM to which specializes in erotic content. It was during a promo interview of this launch, that she confided to youtuber Sam Zirah. When the young man asked about the education of her children, the young woman explained, ” I absolutely forbid that my children be administered by men, as their teachers. ” She swore that if ever the day came that this was to be, she would, ” change the class, the school or move away.”

Cindy Lopes is worried that her children could fall victim to a pedophile.

The declaration seems startling. But this mother justified her position with this elaboration, “When a professor is accused of being a pedophile, he isn’t excluded from the National Education system, but he is silenced.” Her interviewer pressed her to learn more, asking if she herself had been a victim of abuse in her youth. But the mother assured us that no, she had other reasons for her worries. “I was in contact with some people who were journalists in other domains, and who had made investigations into that subject. And I took note that it was a place that was very…we are in a peculiar country… there are some worries in France.”

The Virginity Gap

For Cindy Lopes, France has much to do in regards to sexual predators posted in schools about the country. She explained that France has yet to be held accountable, or scrutinized like England and Belgium have been. Leaving France an open playground for ill-doers in her opinion. “That leaves me thinking that we must pay attention to our children”. And she’s barely getting started on the subject.

Like Libs-of-TikTOK has exposed here in the USA, the public school system is rife with disturbed individuals who take pride in indoctrinating children into their own person beliefs. But here it is obvious that men are not exclusively to blame. Women too are at ground zero when it comes manipulating our children’s sexual development, often in lieu of teaching the life skills that parents sent them to the institutions to learn. So maybe it’s the system we should boycott, or maybe in France, pedophilia, is a gender specific law…perhaps France’s president knows something about that, he is after all married to his high school drama teacher.

by

The post Cindy Lopes fears pedophiles appeared first on Steele Hard.