OnlyFans and Child Porn frequently find themselves in bed together. From anal sex scenes with little boys, to fellatio scenes with infants, it’s often available on OnlyFans to those who go looking for it. While the general public is blissfully ignorant to the severity of this problem, the callous profiteers are making money together distributing CSAM.

For seven months photos and videos of children being raped were exchanged without hindrance.

Child Porn: aka Child Sex Abuse Material (CSAM), fills almost every corner of the Internet. It lurks in the shadows of all social media and every platforms which allow the public to upload content to is flooded with it. Like a broken record, the corporations who own these sites continuously repeat their slogans that they’re “Doing everything possible to protect children” and they “Report and cooperate with the appropriate agencies.” – Considering the amount money that can be made and the time it takes to remove the CSAM, are they really motivated to protect the innocent or is this just another part of doing business?

It took seven months for OnlyFans when self-reported child abuse images. In the case of Christopher Varney, 60, of Florida and Abel Esquivel, 35, of San Francisco. People could view images which ranged from of anal sex with little boys to oral with enfants. During those seven months, the level of degradation and abuse exchanged via members-only access, only augmented.

OnlyFans assures that it is committed to stamping out CSAM, and it’s apparently cooperating with NCMEC. (National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.) But the proliferation of CSAM is like a global game of wack a mole, only a few dozen are flagged every month by OnlyFans. Meanwhile the platform approves over 60K new creator accounts each month, and has since at least 2021. (That’s almost a million new channels of distribution to watch every year). With this level of continued expansion it’s impossible for OnlyFans to be able to monitor all accounts. What’s more often times when CSAM accounts are discovered, the person registered is NOT who is using it. So all the registration process was legit, but the content within the account did not represent the person who was verified to use it.

That is how Ethan Diaz, a then 21 year old from NJ ended up exploiting a 16 year old Florida girl. He befriended her online and soon he was asking his “girlfriend” for nude pics and solo videos which he posted to an abandoned account on OnlyFans. When he came to Florida, he took the girl into his airbnb to record real sex videos with her. In her absence, her parents discovered nude images and correspondence with Diaz on her phone, and immediately called the Police. Over the course of 3 short months, he was able to make about $10K posting images and video of the girl to OnlyFans, driving traffic from Snapchat and Discord. Diaz has since plea bargained for a 5 year sentence, but what about OnlyFans ? Keily Blair OF CEO said in a TEDx talk in 2023: “We moderate all of the content on our platform. Every text, every message, every audio clip, every livestream, everything gets moderated. We see everything. We’re doing it to keep our community safe.”  So should they not be accountable for monitoring when accounts suddenly go active again and the images don’t match ?

The double standard

Ask any legacy porn industry veteran, law enforcement would have quickly shut down their productions pending investigations. Depending on the circumstances, those involved in the production faced possible criminal charges. Yet, law enforcement appears to have no desire to get involved with the big tech porn industry and only pursues easy to arrest individuals. – OnlyFans corporate officers are untouchable.

Allowing the public to upload homemade porn was always a bad idea. The old school porn veterans instinctively knew this fact. But for them, if further emphasis was needed, they only had to look in their mail bags and watch the homemade DVD mailed to them or look outside their office windows at the creepy guy who brought a young girl for them to see. Since the wake-up call of the 1980s with Traci Lords, legacy pornographers dealt with child exploiters on a grass roots level and albeit, most weren’t above using a baseball bat.

Sites like OnlyFans are leaving a highway sized trail of abused children. Soviet era dictator Joseph Stalin said, “A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.” This concept is easy to understand, the average person can identify and feel empathy for a single victim. But, when the number of victims exceed a certain amount, they’re de-humanized and turned into a simple math equation. The public feels nothing for them and therefore takes no interest.

All victims have a name.

Morally and legally, a child victim shouldn’t and can’t have their name published. But this doesn’t make them any less human or lessen the abuse and exploitation they’ve endured.  Their histories should carry weight and meaning in the public’s heart. Seeing the abused and not a statistic goes a very long way to prevent rape from happening to others. – On the other hand, turning victims into stats only benefits corporate and political greed.

One Boston boy at 15 started dating a man twice his age, whom he met online. He allowed Kharee Louis-Jeune to film them together only to find out later that he had posted the footage to an OnlyFans account. The high-schooler was mortified and changed his appearance, but still the incident haunted him. A classmate asked “if I had been sucking any penises in cars,” he recalled in his court statement. “My heart dropped and he ended up showing me the video.” He met again with the man at 17, to tell him he didn’t want to be touched, and get his license plate number should he need it. Two weeks later Louis-Jeune audaciously taunted him, that his video was popular, sending his OnlyFans link, that’s when the boy broke and went to police. 

Similarly 25-year-old Wyatt Maxwell exploited a 16 year old Kansas boy. Netting more than $49,000 on OnlyFans alone. Leaving the question, is OnlyFans really doing all they can to protect children, especially when this example alone was a near $10,000 profit for them.

Zero financial incentive to stamp out child porn.

Clearly, the criminal doesn’t and shouldn’t have access to the funds. But it’s proven to be difficult to locate the information as to who eventually gets the money earned from CSAM, Should OnlyFans be keeping the money, when someone gets arrested. they would be holding 100% instead of their customary 20%. So there are no financial reasons to take quick action. On the other hand, should law enforcement, or another government agency, be seizing the funds, then there’s little desire to stop children being raped on camera. – The expression “follow the money” holds true and when the money trail is difficult to follow, it’s sure sign that politics and wealthy people are the benefactors.

Charlie Biggs, a legacy porn industry pornographer, once said; “Say what you want about the Traci Lords scandal, she still got paid.” – Whatever funds or resources the government might make available to the victims, the fact is that they worked /suffered for the money and they should be the ones who receive it. They’re going to have years or even decades of trauma to deal with and they’re the only people who have a moral claim to the funds. On the other hand, OnlyFans should face fierce fines and its executive officers held criminally accountable.

In fact, one of the greatest complaints is that, even after something is flagged or reported, the account continues to function. Matthew Richardson aka OnlyFans Skylar Ravenwood uploaded content of his sexual exploits with a 16 year old back in 2022. He was arrested with the girl a month later. Footage of the minor was removed with his incarceration. But despite a blatant breech of OnlyFans rules, his account remained active for a year and a half. 17 extra months of journalist and curious folk, due to the press concerning his arrest, calling up an account that should have been torn down. 17 months of potential profit to OnlyFANS.

Sometimes it’s the out of control teens who self exploit. Take for instance Maryland teen, Monie Graham, she readily admits to having beat OnlyFans vetting process not once but twice as a minor. Her first account was created using someone else’s ID. Her mother had it shut down, but it wasn’t easy, as her complaints to OnlyFans seemed to fall on deaf ears. Finally weeks later when she was able to get the help of the FBI and a county investigator, the site co-operated. But her daughter was not about to lose a money source and simply asked her Instagram followers, if anyone had an account that they weren’t using. Within no time, she was back at it. Graham, now a legal adult ran into trouble when CSAM investigator Matt Richardson (no relation to Skylar mentioned above), discovered that her legal-age account contained content that still held the watermark of her dismantled minor profile. He reported the illegal content to NCMEC and OnlyFans shut down her account.

Sexualization of children has long-term negative effects on the psychological development of kids.  With the rise of AI, new legislation is being written to go after generated content of minors, as it’s existence normalizes child abuse as well as making it harder to rescue real victims. Complaints and investigations have led to a global effort to align legislation against CSAM. But as with Monie Graham, often times the fast easy money is too much temptation to worry about long-term effects or consequences.

OnlyFans became a household name during the pandemic lockups, synonymous with porn and online sex. They are the giant, and they dwarf their competition. That is because it plays both sides of the fence. Nobody sees OnlyFans profiles without regular social media to drive traffic. Similar less prolific fan platforms are banned from most social media. On Instragram, where OnlyFans links are allowed. Minor Attracted Persons (MAP), aka pedophiles, are masturbating to your innocent family photos. MAPs are able to click on an innocent cutie that leads to an Onlyfans account of suggestive photos, which in turn, offers links to VIP secondary accounts for the harder core porn… Both legal and illegal.

In 2021 when it first became evident that OnlyFans was being exploited to distribute CSAM, then CEO and creator Tim Stokely, banned adult. The abrupt ban, said to appease share holders was short lived and Stokely subsequently stepped down from his position. Having sold all his shares to Fenix International Ltd. , Stokely has done his best to distance himself, from the ever expanding platform that he started.

Current owner Leonid Radvinsky was still an underage minor when he launched his first online porn company, Cybertania Inc. Successfully starting and managing an online porn company is difficult enough for experienced adult businessmen and pornographers. Therefore, it’s no surprise that 17 year old Leonid Radvinsky had help from his mother, Anna Radvinsky who was listed as the company president. – Logically given this information, the majority of people will be asking; “ How old was Leonid Radvinsky when he was first given access to pornography?” And, “Was he ever sexually abused or groomed by his parents ?”

A Forbes investigation into Cybertania inc., exposed how a teenaged Radvinsky made millions with a shady empire of websites which advertised access to illegal porn and hacked passwords. Today’s older Leonid Radvinsky has already personally profited more than a billion dollars since buying OnlyFans. Given his history, earning money from CSAM might not pose any moral problems for him. Unfortunately, his past also means there might be a possibility that the unhindered proliferation of minors on OnlyFans happens for reasons that do not involve money.

RE: Consenting Adults

Man arrested after uploading pornographic images of a minor

by

The post OnlyFans and Child Porn appeared first on Steele Hard.

Age verification, in the legacy porn industry, was non-debatable. Albeit, many of the performers, pornographers and distributors only agreed with age verification because no one wanted the public backlash, rather than due to a moral duty to protect minors. However, the legacy porn biz did not have a shortage of single moms trying to make a decent living or dads paying child support. James DiGiorgio (Jimmy D) once said, “Almost everyone in front of the camera has a kid. We’re a business that loves our kids and will protect them with a bat.” For the few smut creators left of the old school, arguing against some form of age barrier is something akin to a South Park episode.

Big tech and the political scam

Technology was once the porn industry’s ally, but the big tech platforms turned out to traitors. Porn tube sites (platforms such as P0rn Hùb) allowed users to upload and share adult content for free.

1. No demands for paperwork which attested to the performer’s age.
2. No proof that videos were uploaded with consent and not as revenge porn.
3. No proof of copyright ownership.

But worse of all…

• No proof that those who “Clicked Yes to Enter” were legal adults.

The “click to enter” function was normally accompanied by some pseudo legalese text giving it the appearance that it was some form of an electronic attestation /contract with the user. Except those under 18 cannot be bound by such a contact. More importantly though minors cannot be expected to be truthful. Especially when faced with the “attractive nuisance” that online pornography is. To simplify, any site’s “Enter only if you’re over 18” button, legally has less worth than the paper it was printed on (NB: it’s not written on paper). Yet, despite this reality, worldwide governments, lawyers and even anti-porn groups accepted this as a sufficient gate-keeper to deter children.

One of the first and largest porn tube sites, received large sums of startup capital from Fortress Investment Group which as founded in 1988 by Wesley R. Edens, a former partner at BlackRock. In 2002, Fortress welcomed Peter Briger, a former Goldman Sachs banker into its executive roster. Clearly this private equity firm has substantial financial assets and powerful political influence. Quite literally the stuff that conspiracy theories are made of: Were the last 20 years liberal porn access due to global incompetence among the ruling class or were there other agendas being pursued ?

Clearly politicians don’t really have our best interests at heart. They can’t get elected unless they have the support of those who control the thoughts (media) and purse-strings of the nation. Whether it’s political contributions, insider trading, or direct bribery, even the most saintly individual will eventually exchange favors for money. Because anyone who is able to resist this temptation will eventually be replaced by someone who isn’t so morally inhibited. Therefore at this point in time, it’s irrelevant if various governments were just neglectful or if some conspiracy was at play. In all likelihood, it’s probably varying degrees of incompetence and corruption.

Big Tech holds all the Cards

Twenty plus years with tube sites having free reign over adult content is all the proof one needs that activist groups and lawyer organizations were not really fighting to protect minors. All which was needed was to enforce the laws that were already in place. Instead we got rhetoric that these “new” technologies required “new” digitally specific legislation. By exposing and discrediting these organizations, we can better focus on legitimate solutions to the issue at hand.

Politicians are using the issue of age verification for adult sites as a means to garner media attention. By championing the cause of protecting children from explicit content, they can present themselves as moral crusaders. Pandering, on the surface, to the well meaning public. This seemly noble cause to protect the innocent, covers a corporate fascist agenda.

The twenty years that they took to address this issue was just time enough to consolidate most of the porn industry into a handful of tech companies. Furthermore, in this time, the world has developed a dependency on social media. The combination of profiling through social media and porn consumption will create a complete profile of individuals. Social media already has a profile based on contact information, personal tastes, public values, as well as social circle. Giving big tech control over the ID verification for porn consumption will allow social media profiles to be over-layed with your physical address, as well as your most intimate and private desires.

Online ID verification is a database readily accessible by corporations, banks, government agencies and law enforcement, with little or no oversight and even less transparency. Any individual’s sexual proclivities can easily be cross-referenced with their government issued Identification. A married woman with children may have secret lesbian desires. While a middle-age man might enjoy seeing barely legal videos. Imagine the potential for blackmail and damage if it were to be irrefutably known that a high ranking military official, national security agent, head of state or even banker enjoys watching humiliation and degradation videos.

Democratizing means in the hands of the people.

Many of the jizz biz old schooler’s have commented that if there ever was an industry that didn’t require democratization, it’s the porn industry. The porn tubes and fan platforms (eg: 0nly Fàns) do little to promote individual sexual expression or diversity, in fact, strict rules of engagement ensure conformity. All the platforms use monetization and banning as tools of censorship for any sex act or scenario, they deem too divergent from their desired norms. Meanwhile, they financially reward only a small elite group of content makers. The truth is that 99% of content creators earn little, to nothing, for their work.

The legacy pornographers fought for the Right to Freedom of Speech. Only, this right wasn’t won through the direct use of technology. It’s impossible to create democracy by using corporate controlled social media or blogging about social problems when google (and soon AI) controls what the public sees. Porn became recognized as a form of Free Speech when people were willing to go to jail for creating it. In other words, democracy is in defiance and it’s in an angry mob. It’s not going to be found on the Internet.

The only workable solution to truly protect minors remains a paywall, with access purchased at a physical store. There are much fewer of these places than there were 20 years ago, but like the few remaining die hard pornographers, some do continue despite of online domination. Without a doubt, Big tech will continue to dominate distribution because of their resources. However, many avenues could open up for the small “mom and pop” adult businesses willing to deal directly with the public.

For example:

• In a strip bar, dancers could directly sell access to their sites or content. The bar could use off hours to allow dancers who worked there to make content, which could be used to get more people interested in seeing the dancers in person.

• Swingers could sell access to their amateur home movies at parties and swinger clubs. Or the clubs could offer (in person verified) members a whole technical immersion. Everything from a members only chat/ dating app, to a virtual tour of the club, to a place for member created content visible only to other club members. With membership incentives for popular content.

• Likewise small independent producers could promote their productions at venues such as Exxotica. Or perhaps, future independent pornographers could partner with their local adult boutiques.

The list of possibilities for direct sales is only limited by imagination. Big corporations can only limit what someone sees, and they increase these limitations regularly. Whereas small producers innovate and create art! In a very ironic sense, this grassroots approach to porn production would be even more democracy within porn. Unfortunately, it’s a form of sexual and economic freedom that neither government, nor the big corporations desire or will allow.

Now more than ever, what’s required is 20^th century anger and bravery. The corporations and government have gained control over the minds and hearts of many people. It stands to reason that they also want control over your genitals. Orwell’s 1984 is already upon us, it’s now just a question of who will finally acknowledge the threat and take a stand.

by

The post Age verification appeared first on Steele Hard.

Male Sex Workers suffer abuse and hatred just like their female counterparts.

Beau, a gigolo and French pornstar almost died from injuries he suffered at the hands of a client. A married woman in her 50s, had used his services for a little more than 2 years. He describes their relationship as very amicable and nothing sexually perverse. Her reasons for using his services seemed to be something other than purely sexual, she wanted the attention and to be made to feel that she was desired. The 20 year difference in age between Beau and herself only seemed to make their meetings more special.

But all that changed when unknown to Beau, her husband had left her for a much younger woman. Their ensuing encounter, started with conversation over a glass of wine, a casual exchange that demonstrated a familiarity and comfort level. However, she had spiked Beau’s drink with Roofies (Rohypnol). She then proceeded to unleash her jilted fury on the man before her, cutting and burning his penis and inserting spoons and forks in his anus. When she was satisfied with what she had done, she had somehow got Beau into her car and drove him the bois de Vincennes where she left him at the park’s entrance.

He was found by a firefighter walking his dog who realized something was wrong and called for an ambulance. Beau was taken to the hospital and it was discovered that 2 dinner forks were still inside of him. Hospital staff were professional, seeking only to render assistance, whereas everyone associated with helping rape victims were accusatory. His sexual orientation was recorded as gay despite his insistence that he wasn’t. He was also questioned about his drug use, he was sober accept for the Roofies. Finally, when it became known that was a pornstar, everyone lost interest in him, with few openly saying he probably got hurt in a porn shoot gone wrong.

Sex work is still work.

Sex work has long been a contentious issue, with debates centered on its legality, morality, and the impact it has on individuals and society. In recent years, sex worker advocacy groups have emerged to fight for the rights and protection of sex workers, often focusing on the experiences of female sex workers. However, male sex workers are marginalized and ignored within these organizations, leaving them vulnerable to abuse, discrimination, and violence. The argument many associated with these groups make is that male sex workers exist in very small numbers and that their focus is on trying to help the largest number of people possible. Perhaps Beau had said it best, “This is classic feminist hypocrisy. Only women can be victimized.”

No one has ever done any adequate research and there’s almost no interest to investigate what percentage of men are prostitutes compared to that of women. Literally in a textbook in academic circles, male prostitution is estimated at 10 to 54 % of the sex worker population. (Allman 1999). A variation that is too large to be taken seriously accept to show that nobody really knows the reality of the situation. Andrew Fogg (2017) writing for Medium noted that 42% of the prostitution ads on Adultwork were males, yet organizations and governments consider 20% a generous estimate when factoring resources.

A large portion of male prostitutes begin as strippers or porn talent, so they are able to use more direct tactics, such as word of mouth, to ply their trade. Male sex workers agree that they exist in much larger number than what’s generally believed and in last decade, male prostitution has been growing. The secrecy is the result of a 3 fold problem.

• (1.) The women and couples who use their services demand much greater discretion.
• (2.) The majority of men chose to be silent about being raped because of public mockery.
• (3.) When they do attempt to speak up about being sexually assaulted, they face possible double victimization. Men are frequently accused by the police and support groups of being the rapist, trying to conceal their crime by pretending to be the victim.

Male prostitutes either know or quickly learn that, given the popular prejudices against them, it’s safer to accept what has been done to them and not speak about it to anyone. It’s a brutal reality, taunted by the anti-rape slogan “Believe every woman”; because no one is saying, “Believe every victim.”

Sex worker advocacy groups and victim resources tend to focus solely on “the weaker sex” with the argument that they have historically faced greater violence. (Budd et al., 2019). Considering the current conditions which say “no man should be believed” and that men can only be assailants and never victims, then perhaps it’s time to question historical accuracy. Today everyone knows that history is written by the winners which logically means that male victims of sexual assault are among history’s ultimate losers.

In 2024 there is a growing acknowledgment of diverse gender identities. Group identity politics dominate the government, the media and academia. The overwhelming problem with this is that the traditional male identity is considered the evil patriarchy and blamed for all problems. It’s therefore unfortunate that old biases against men, rampant within the sex work industry, perpetuate the invisibility of male sex workers (Budd et al., 2019). Additionally, the sex worker rights movement are linked to the broader fight for women’s and LGBTQ+ rights, further contributing to the marginalization of male sex workers (Sanders, 2018).

The calls for inclusive advocacy continue to be very elusive when the discussion turns to men. Male sex workers face increased risks of violence, abuse, and exploitation due to their invisibility within advocacy groups (Budd et al., 2019). They may also struggle to access essential health services, such as HIV prevention and treatment, as these services are often tailored to the needs of those who present female (World Health Organization, 2019).

Assaulting a male sex worker should not be more acceptable.

After organizing a sex event, the client paid for the male sex worker’s ride home. The driver recognized the man from his work as a porn-star and asked for oral sex. When he politely declined his offer with a comment that he was tired and not mentally prepared for a male-to-male physical encounter. The driver became hostile and sprayed his passenger with what appeared to be bear spray. He was kicked out of the vehicle and left stranded, at apx 3:30am, several miles from populace. To this day, the ride sharing service has never followed up correspondences. Lawyers have been either quick money shysters or very reluctant to take the case without steep financial reimbursement. Law enforcement is obviously also, not an option – The author (me) of this article is the victim in this case

References

Allman Dan. (1999) M is for Mutual, A is for Acts: Male Sex Work and AIDS in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto, HIV Social, Behavioural and Epidemiological Studies Unit

Bimbi David S. (2007) Male Prostitution: Pathology, Paradigms and Progress in Research. Journal of Homosexuality. 53(1–2):7–35.

Budd, J., Bell, B., & Campbell, R. (2019). Understanding and responding to the sexual health needs of men who sell sex: A review of the literature. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 95(7), 482-487.

Fogg, A. (2014). <Gender differences amongst sex workers online | by Andrew Fogg | Medium>

Sanders, T. (2018). Sex work, gender and the politics of inequality. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 10(2), 209-229.

World Health Organization. (2019). <HIV and Sex Workers>

by

The post Male Sex Workers are Marginalized appeared first on Steele Hard.

Freedom of Movement ‘s destruction will usher in the dawn of a New Slavery.

Freedom of movement is a fundamental human right that is essential for the realization of other rights and for promoting human dignity (United Nations, 1948). It enables individuals to travel, reside, and work in different locations, and is crucial for the development of a vibrant and diverse society. However, numerous governments are implementing policies and practices that restrict or even destroy this basic right. Without Freedom of movement, no other human right is possible. Freedom of speech, bodily autonomy, due process and even the right to arms don’t happen in a closed society, where travel is controlled. Freedom of movement, stimulates individual thought, thereby encouraging the exchange of ideas, or learning other ways of life through personal experience. It also breaks the back of traditional censorship tactics because information passes by word of mouth.

Governments worldwide are imposing restrictions on this essential liberty, ostensibly for reasons such as national security, public health, and environmental protection. The restrictions on freedom of movement imposed by governments around the world represent a disturbing trend towards overreach and control. This overreach is particularly concerning when it comes to career politicians, who may be using these restrictions as a means to consolidate power and maintain their grip on society.

The imposition of these restrictions can be seen as a form of mass enslavement, where individuals are no longer free to make fundamental decisions about their own lives. As long as whom you speak to and where you are allowed to go is limited, people can be corralled like livestock. What’s more, they trample the outliers who try to break from the herd and go their own way. Instead, they become subject to the whims of those in power, who can dictate where they live, work, and travel. This insidious form of control is often cloaked in the guise of public safety, health, or environmental protection (Source 1).

Border Controls and Immigration Policies

Governments have implemented strict border controls and immigration policies, regulating the movement of people across their borders. These restrictions are often said to be justified in order to protect national security, and maintain cultural cohesion. However, people who seek power tend to have the desire to control and dominate the population. As it stands only the very wealthy, who can literally purchase multiple passports/citizenship and those who claim refugee status (and absolute dependence on the government) are able to go where they want. Any hardworking regular person, must return within a short term to their “owners”.

Played out there are several examples globally of this overreach. Nationalist ideologies often emphasize the importance of maintaining cultural and ethnic homogeneity, which can lead to policies that limit immigration and freedom of movement (Mudde & Kaltwasser, 2017). The United States’ travel ban, which restricts entry for citizens of several Muslim-majority countries, is a prime example of how nationalist and populist rhetoric can translate into policy (DHS, 2020). Another tactic is in the name of security, where governments implement stringent border controls and immigration policies, arguing that these measures are necessary to protect their citizens from potential threats (Neal et al., 2018). These measures often disproportionately impact innocent individuals seeking to exercise their right to freedom of movement. For example: The European Union’s External Border Management Policy, has been criticized for limiting freedom of movement and imposing additional hardships on refugees and asylum seekers (European Commission, 2020).

Resource Management

Some argument could even be made that this global practice of border control and stringent immigration policies, isn’t really to keep fresh minds out as much as it is to keep citizens home. The reasoning being that citizens, particularity the working class are part of a country’s resources. Concerns resource scarcity are also used to justify restrictions on freedom of movement. Australia’s strict immigration policies, which are often justified on environmental and resource scarcity grounds, have been criticized for limiting freedom of movement and failing to address the root causes of migration (Baker, 2012). While managing resources and addressing environmental challenges are crucial, these concerns should not be used as a pretext for limiting the fundamental rights of individuals.

Economic factors play a significant role in driving restrictions on freedom of movement. Some governments believe that limiting immigration is necessary to protect domestic labor markets and ensure employment opportunities for their citizens (Friedberg, 2001). These concerns can lead to policies that restrict the movement of workers, such as, the UK’s decision to leave the European Union. Which was driven in part by concerns about immigration and labor market competition, now has led to increased restrictions on the freedom of movement for both British and EU citizens (Jones et al., 2018). Post Brexit only the those with at least half a million euros in investment capital can purchase their freedom and an EU passport. (source 4)

Travel Restrictions and Quarantines

In response to public health crises, governments have imposed travel restrictions and quarantines. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a significant curtailment of freedom of movement around the world. Governments implemented travel restrictions, border closures, and quarantine measures in an attempt to control the spread of the virus (WHO, 2020). While many in the medical community have good intentions, there is a growing body of both rumors and evidence which point that the health crisis was a pretext for a political power grab. A soft coup carried out by career politicians, high-level political bureaucrats and their billionaire allies to impose draconian authoritarianism by limiting freedom of movement.

The closure of international borders and implementation of strict quarantine measures in countries such as New Zealand and Australia severely limited freedom of movement, even for citizens and permanent residents (Hufbauer et al., 2020). Looking back, the use of quarantines and lock-downs were a form of mass imprisonment, stripping individuals of their basic rights and liberties.

Throughout history, restricting freedom of movement has often preceded episodes of mass enslavement and oppression. For example, the Nazi regime in Germany began by imposing restrictions on the movement of Jews and other minorities, eventually leading to the Holocaust (Source 2). In the United States, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 allowed for the capture and return of escaped slaves, severely limiting the freedom of movement for African Americans and perpetuating their enslavement (Source 3).

The restrictions on freedom of movement have far-reaching implications for society as a whole. They stifle the exchange of ideas, culture, and knowledge, as people are prevented from interacting with one another on a global scale. This isolation can lead to increased xenophobia, as individuals are less exposed to diverse perspectives and experiences. Moreover, these restrictions can have devastating economic consequences, as individuals are unable to pursue job opportunities or engage in international trade. This can lead to increased poverty, inequality, and social unrest, as people become more desperate to provide for their basic needs.

Freedom of movement is a fundamental human right that is under significant pressure from various governmental actions around the world. From nationalism and populism to security concerns and economic factors, governments are implementing policies that restrict or even destroy this basic right. It is crucial that we remain vigilant and continue to advocate for the protection of freedom of movement, both in our own countries and on the global stage. Only by doing so can we ensure that this fundamental human right is preserved for future generations.

It’s your future… It’s your children’s future… It’s your grandchildren’s future… Use your voices today or have no choice but to use guns tomorrow. What your future will be depends on what you do now.

Also read : The Dumbing Down of Society

Sources:

1. “The Global Compact for Migration: A Threat to Sovereignty and Freedom.” (2018). Retrieved from <https://www.heritage.org/immigration/report/the-global-compact-migration-threat-sovereignty-and-freedom>
2. “The Holocaust: A Tragic Legacy.” (n.d.). Retrieved from <https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005143>
3. “The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.” (n.d.). Retrieved from <https://www.archives.gov/historical-docs/document.html?doc=10&title.raw=Fugitive%20Slave%20Act%20of%201850>
4. “EU Passport for non-EU citizens:” (2024) <https://www.globalcitizensolutions.com/how-to-get-an-eu-passport-for-uk-citizens-after-brexit/>
5. DHS (2020). Proclamation 9645. Retrieved from <https://www.dhs.gov/news/2020/01/31/proclamation-9645>

1. Baker, G. (2012). Environmentalism and the ‘New’ Immigration Politics in Australia. In G. Connor & S. Lester (Eds.), Immigration, Emigration and Migration: International Perspectives on a Changing World (pp. 19-34). New York: Routledge.European Commission (2020).
2. External Border Management. Retrieved from <https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background-information/external-border-management_en>Friedberg, R. M. (2001).
3. You Can’t Take It with You? Immigration and the Portability of Human Capital. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(2), 221-251.Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., & Zhang, Y. (2020).
4. The Global Trade Disruption: COVID-19 Consequences and Policy Responses. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Jones, R., Lodge, G., & Jayasuriya, K. (2018).
5. Brexit and the British Constitution: The Impact on the Union State and the Future of the UK. The Political Quarterly, 89(3), 425-434.Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017).
6. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Neal, R., Aas, K. F., & Kalland, A. H. (2018).
7. The Ethics of Immigration Policy: A Survey. Journal of Ethics and Migration Studies, 4(3), 325-346.United Nations (1948).
8. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from <https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/>WHO (2020).
9. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 11 March 2020. Retrieved from <https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19—11-march-2020>

by

The post Freedom of movement crisis appeared first on Steele Hard.

Fuck project 25, because it’s time pornographers stop behaving like crows sitting on a fence. Our current situation is that there is no shortage of people who are making massive sums of money from the porn industry by promising to either destroy it or protect it. Ambitious politicians and anti-porn lobbyists are becoming billionaires by promising to destroy porn. Meanwhile, free speech activists are equally getting rich by promising to defend us. In the middle are the porn consumers who don’t give a damn as long as they don’t have to pay to watch adult content.

The Rise of Censorship and Regulation in the US Market

The adult entertainment industry, long a haven for free expression and entrepreneurship, faces mounting pressure from regulators, censors, and societal norms. Project 25, a series of guidelines designed to combat human trafficking, will have stifling consequences for pornographers and content creators. Monopolizing on the media’s willful ignorance and bias, the porn industry has been portrayed as the largest source of human trafficking. Porn creators and performers have become a scapegoat. A convenient way to hide the fact that ruling class and wealthy elites have openly engaged in this inhumane criminal activity, with very little public scrutiny.

Famous celebrities and elites such as P Diddy, R. Kelly and Jeffery Epstein have been recently exposed for abuses which seem to have been perpetrated for more than 3 decades. However, in the same way the names on Jeffery Epstein’s client list have never been exposed, the people who helped these men commit their crimes will never be known. Each time the public becomes vocal about knowing the truth, the porn industry is thrust into the spotlight by the media, to play the role of the boogie man.

While the intentions behind Project 25 are may appear to be noble, the restrictions will make it increasingly difficult for those who depend on the adult industry to earn a living. And it should be noted that for every inroad made to censor “adult content”, the tools are being perfected to censor any unwanted voice, video or dissension from any social media user. Monetization is how things are ultimately controlled, precluding already certain vocabulary in an Orwellian sort of reality. Terms like Seggs and un-alive wouldn’t exist if not for the over-censorship. Not to mention that this entire industry sounds like agricultural professionals, having to use terms like corn, eggplant and even pineapples for porn, penis and swingers.

Moreover, major credit card companies have imposed strict limitations on transactions and what kind of porn can be monetized. This makes it challenging for creators to receive payment for their work and fueled the in-pouring of creators to fan platforms. The list of what’s permitted to be shown regularly changes based on the whims of the payment processors. In 1980 a movie called Taboo showed mother and son incest. Despite the fact that neither Kay Parker nor her co-star, Mike Ranger, were related and high demand, similar modern videos are far less likely to be produced. Instead, the bulk of them are labeled as “Step-mother and step-son” in order to avoid censorship and monetization problems.

Crypto as a Solution for Monetization

In response to these challenges, pornographers and content creators should turn to cryptocurrencies as a means of monetizing their work. Crypto offers several advantages over traditional payment methods, including increased anonymity, reducing transaction fees and providing an international currency. By using crypto, creators can bypass the restrictions imposed by credit card companies, enabling them to continue producing and distributing independently their adult products.

The benefit to the consumer is they will no longer face re-occurring billing, as each crypto transaction must be initiated by the purchaser, not the vendor. Therefore fraudulent credit card “banging” would also become a thing of the past. Furthermore, there’s a greater degree of privacy as once crypto is in an anonymous wallet, the banking system cannot see what is being purchased and the porn site can not see who is making the purchase. Which means, for example, a Christian minister who’s career depends on him being heterosexual, can secretly indulge his desires to see gay sex, with far less fear of discovery.

Exploiting Foreign Markets: A World of Opportunity

Hosting a website outside of U.S. jurisdiction can offer significant benefits, particularly in avoiding censorship. Many countries have more lenient regulations regarding freedom of speech, allowing content creators to express themselves without the constant threat of suppression. By choosing a host in a jurisdiction with stronger protections for free expression, individuals can safeguard their websites from arbitrary take-downs and governmental interference. This not only promotes a more open exchange of ideas, but also encourages innovation and creativity, as people feel empowered to share diverse perspectives. Additionally, hosting abroad can provide a layer of anonymity and privacy, further protecting users from surveillance and censorship efforts. Overall, opting for offshore hosting can be a strategic move for those seeking to maintain their voice in an increasingly regulated digital landscape.

As the US market becomes increasingly hostile to adult content creators, foreign markets should be considered to expand their audience and increase revenue. By creating content tailored to the tastes and preferences of foreign cultures, pornographers and content creators can efficiently exploit these untapped markets. One key to success in foreign markets is the adaptation of content to local languages and cultural norms. By producing adult content in multiple languages and catering to the diverse preferences of global audiences, creators can significantly increase their potential customer base.

The adult entertainment industry faces significant challenges due to increasing regulation and censorship. However, there is hope in the form of crypto-based solutions and the untapped potential of foreign markets. By embracing these opportunities, the industry can continue to thrive and innovate, ensuring that adult content creators can continue to express themselves freely and profitably. It is time for the industry to abandon the restrictive confines of the US market and explore the global potential of adult entertainment. Ironically, this maybe a win-win scenario for those who are currently trying to restructure western culture. By sanctioning what is acceptable pornography, they are asking those who want to make or see something other than copy-cat content to leave.

The door is being held open, time to wave goodbye and say Fuck Project 25

—

—

Discuss Fuck Project 25 on X /twitter

by

The post Fuck Project 25 appeared first on Steele Hard.

Dumbing down of society has benefited the ruling and wealthy classes to the point that, more likely than not, it’s been done on purpose. Discussing with any seriousness the lowering of average individual’s IQ is quickly marginalized as a conspiracy theory. Yet paradoxically, it’s the same « Joe Average » in society who’s sounding the alarm on a situation that’s becoming self-evident even to the intelligence challenged. This is akin to an obese person looking at themselves in the mirror and acknowledging that they have a weight problem.

The internet has undeniably changed the way humans consume information, share ideas, and engage with one another. While it has led to tremendous advancements in various fields, it has also had an effect: the dumbing down of the general population. This phenomenon leaves many people vulnerable to manipulation by governments and corporations. Whom appear to have purposely orchestrated this process for greater control over society, thereby securing their interests.

There’s no shortage of political and financial organizations where the self-titled « elites» of society interface with one another. Despite globalization policies, a conspiracy for control of the entire world still seems improbable. More easy to accept is how the late George Carlin put it, « There are no conspiracies when there are convergent interests. » Or, people will inevitably support and cooperate with others whose actions / policies fit with their own agendas. – It’s obligatory to explore the reasons for the dumbing down of society, the role the Internet plays and the benefits which governments and large corporations gain from it.

Internet and the Dumbing Down of Society

Regardless of its quality, the internet has made information more accessible. However, this saturation of information has led to a decline in critical thinking and the ability to discern credible sources. People are increasingly relying on headlines, tweets, and soundbites to inform their opinions, rather than engaging with in-depth, well-researched content (Brock, 2020). This superficial engagement with information has resulted in a dumbed-down society, where people are easily swayed by sensationalism and emotional appeals.

Social media platforms, in particular, have contributed to this phenomenon. Ignoring for a moment the prevalence of bots, marketers, lobbyists and other goal oriented people and organizations. The majority of people using social media rarely contribute to any conversations and only haphazardly share links. Among private citizens, it’s the hated troll who is the instigator of much of the conversations. The different sites were quick to take notice and structured their algorithms to favor arguments and amplify sentiments of being offended.

The algorithms were also subsequently structured that drive these platforms designed to show users content that aligns with their interests and beliefs, creating echo chambers that reinforce pre-existing biases and further amplified hostilities, because anyone questioning perceived dogma was attacked. (Sunstein, 2009). This in turn shuts down rational dialogue and debate. Hampering the development of critical thinking skills and stifling intellectual growth.

The Role of Governments and Corporations

Governments and large corporations have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo and retaining control over the population. A dumbed-down population is easier to manipulate and control, as they are more susceptible to propaganda and fear-mongering (Huxley, 1932). By keeping people misinformed and disengaged from meaningful discourse, governments and corporations can continue to pursue their agendas without significant opposition. In some cases, governments have even resorted to censoring information or promoting disinformation to further their goals. For example, during the Cold War, the United States government engaged in a campaign of misinformation and censorship to discredit and silence voices that were critical of its policies (Chomsky & Herman, 1988).

A dumbed-down society offers several advantages to governments and large corporations. Firstly, it allows them to maintain control over the population by keeping people misinformed and compliant. A population that lacks critical thinking skills is less likely to question authority or challenge the status quo (Orwell, 1949). Secondly, it enables them to manipulate public opinion and shape it in their favor. By controlling the flow of information and promoting certain narratives, they can sway public opinion to support their policies or products. One example of how large corporations spread misleading information to protect their interests was evidenced by the tobacco industry’s efforts to deny the health risks of smoking (Glantz & Slade, 1990).

The Benefits of a Dumbed-Down Society

Moreover, a dumbed-down society is more likely to consume goods and services without considering the long-term consequences or hidden costs. For corporations, this translates into increased sales and profits, as people become more focused on short-term gratification and less concerned with the broader implications of their actions (Schor, 2007).

Undeniably, the internet has contributed to the dumbing down of society, making people more susceptible to manipulation by governments and corporations. This process has been facilitated by the design of social media platforms, which encourage superficial engagement with information and create echo chambers that reinforce pre-existing biases.

Furthermore, as the Internet has moved from text to video, the average user doesn’t read but rather passively listens or browses content. And for all the diehard Jordan Peterson fans, who feel an inflated sense of ego brought about by listening to the man of big words, there are a thousand Internet surfers who live by the acronym TLDR (too long ; didn’t read). This dumbing down of society is a deliberate and strategic process that benefits governments and large corporations. By understanding the role of the internet in this process and the motivations behind it, we can take steps to mitigate its effects and hopefully promote a more informed, critically thinking population.

—————————

References

Brock, T. (2020). The benefits and dangers of internet use. In T. Brock & M. Bar-Ilan, The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Digital Humanities (pp. 1-12). Routledge.

Chomsky, N., & Herman, E. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon Books.

Glantz, S. A., & Slade, J. (1990). The Cigarette Papers. University of California Press.

Huxley, A. (1932). Brave New World. Chatto & Windus.

Orwell, G. (1949). 1984. Secker & Warburg.

Schor, J. B. (2007). Consumerism and its discontents. In R. W. Kemp & J. A. Parente, The Human Development Handbook (pp. 21-38). Palgrave Macmillan.

Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.

by

The post Dumbing Down of Society appeared first on Steele Hard.

ChatGPT has been weaponized and for a former university computer science student, the decision to change his major because of their morals has been justified. The majority of people self-delude that the wealthy and powerful are committed to protecting and providing for the less fortunate. However, literally, all recorded human history has demonstrated that most often, these elites are focused exclusively on what will increase their own personal power and/or wealth. Viewing everyone who is not counted part of their select few, as a mere resource to be exploited.

Snake oil salesmen got their name from the 19th century men who traveled the United States selling miracle cures for sicknesses and pains.  These miraculous medicines often offered nothing more than a placebo effect and over time the moniker was adopted to refer to any con job. The point is that it doesn’t take very much to swindle large numbers of people. It’s a very basic strategy that’s used by politicians, preachers, CEOs, cult leaders and marketing departments all over the world. “Smile… Speak Positively… And pretend to be everyone’s best friend.” Basically, the road to success is through political correctness.

But P.C. culture ignores the ugly truths in society, It forces people to pretend that the elephant in the room doesn’t exist, instead of working on a solution to free the massive beast of burden. Likewise, AI in its bid to avoid addressing unsavory topics refuses to respond to requests that are deemed too controversial, or having possible emotional triggers for the sensitive population. Already ChatGPT has been weaponized because it operates according to the values of those who built it. There are numerous examples of the programmer’s personal beliefs influencing its output results. For example, ChatGPT was once asked to write a poem praising former President Donald Trump and it refused on moral grounds. However, it had zero difficulties creating a poem praising President Biden. It doesn’t take a genius to conclude that ChatGPT’s designers vote for Democrats.

Come see SteeleHard videos

AI must be neutral; free of all opinions and emotional biases of those who created it. It must be a machine that has the same loyalties of a hand gun. (ie:  It obeys everyone regardless age, gender, politics, etc. And, it can be used against anyone, including its creators.) Otherwise a widely used tool like ChatGPT has been weaponized against its users, like Orwell’s Ministry of Truth.

On the surface, it might appear comical that someone employed in the porn industry is sounding the alarm that ChatGPT has been weaponized.  Except, the very nature of the porn production is opportunism. This industry has always been at the foreground of exploiting technology to its benefit.  In the jizz biz, it’s never been about what the tech intended purpose is or what it was designed to do.  Instead, it’s always been about “What can it be made to do.”

A handgun makes a bad hammer.

On the other hand, it might be a highly efficient substitute for a drill for putting holes in a wall.

When ChatGPT arrived on the scene, hundreds of content creators rushed to see if they could get it to write pornographic stories. Many spent long hours rephrasing questions and trying to trick the AI with various degrees of success. The current popular consensus is that it remained more or less true to its creator’s ethics. Unfortunately, this is might be the 1st time in history, when a group of people have been banned from using a piece of technology.  It’s not a case of Rosa Parks being told to sit at the back of the bus… Rather, it’s the bus driver making anyone, who they don’t like, pound pavement and walk.

Clearly ChatGPT has been weaponized, and that decision happened long before it was made available to the general public. When it can exclude (ban) one social group of individuals from using it then it can exclude others. Despite the majority of people who consume pornography, the elites wouldn’t shed any tears if sex workers disappeared.  In truth, there are small very vocal groups that lobby for its destruction and this is where the con game is played.

Today’s snake oil selling elites are testing and perfecting their AI weapons using a historically maligned and marginalized group of people. Meanwhile, they convince the ignorant masses that this destruction is truly a virtue and will cure many of society’s ills. When in reality, it’s really a poison being administered. while they themselves flourish financially and politically. They control the words, the thoughts, even the history available to those who use it. Annihilating the wild weeds that take hold despite adversity. Leaving the masses completely dependent upon the elites, and their AIs for all the answers, and entertainment, and absolutely ignorant of what freedoms, liberties and livelihoods have been lost.

When the day arrives that a gun will only work for one person, then the person who controls the gun, will hold all the power.   AI is that gun !

by

The post ChatGPT has been weaponized appeared first on Steele Hard.

Age play is illegal porn because of anti-child exploitation laws. However, age play does NOT involve actual children, it’s role-play between consenting adults. For example, a 40-year-old woman dresses up and acts like a preteen child while her spouse, who is also 40 years old, pretends to be her much older father. Their game might end in some form of penetrative sex. If it’s porn, it’s absolutely going to result in hardcore sex.

NB: It must be made clear that this article is neither an argument for real kiddie porn nor a plea for leniency against those who are found guilty of harming children. Children are our future and safeguarding their innocence is important to a functioning society.

Many different social movements have invoked the expression, “my body, my choice!” Equally, multiple activist groups assert their right to freedom of speech. Unfortunately, the past 3 years has taught us that neither “right” nor “freedom” is exclusively ours to determine. We stop having body autonomy when it interferes with state agendas and/or corporate profits. Freedom of speech is similarly labeled misinformation and quickly censored, when it threatens the wealthy and ruling hierarchies. Yet, many of those who are members of the powerful elite social strata, are the most titillated and heavy consumers of age play sex games and porn. Ironically, it’s this same group of individuals, who pass the laws that declare age play is illegal porn.

Any sex worker can find a 20-year-old woman that looks like she’s 13

Recently in the media, the case of child abuse involving Jeffry Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell became well known. But where the term pedophilia is used for any minor attraction, the people identified in these cases were young teens, not prepubescent. Technically, attraction to pubescent children is hebephilia, but to the public at large, it is all pedophilia. From a sex workers perspective, with the amount of money and political connection that Epstein and Maxwell enjoyed; we’re left asking, “Why not just find a 20 year old woman who looks like she could be 13?”

Is it because age play is illegal porn that CSAM continues to be popular? There are organizations that claim watching adult porn can lead to someone becoming fascinated by kiddie porn. Most people in the porn industry will argue otherwise because by the nature of their jobs, they’re inundated with adult porn. Yet, they don’t start becoming sexually attracted to or even curious about children. From a layman’s perspective, clearly, other factors are at play.

Pheromone soap gets you laid !

In the United States, depending on the jurisdiction, the age of consent can be as young as 16. However, for the porn industry, it’s always 18. Videos titles such as “Barely Legal” and “Try a Teen” have always proven to be popular. Fresh off-the-bus girls often receive their first lessons on how to pose for stills in such a way as to convey youth and innocence. Both men and women (including women who identify as heterosexual) are highly attracted to seeing nude youthful girls, even more so than their young male colleagues. It always has to stop short of any performer saying on camera that they’re younger than 18 because doing so would be illegal. (Ergo, age play is illegal porn.)

See consenting adults having sex

What constitutes age of consent has changed over the years. These changes are most profound between cultures. As little as 150 years ago, it wasn’t so rare to have girls who were married by 13 years of age and having children by 14. To even mention the possibility of such a pair bonding today would bring out hoards of angry people with accusations of child abuse. Perhaps this is the reason why society considers age play illegal porn. Today’s 18-year-old girl probably has more sexual experience than one from 200 years ago, but her maturity level can be very much lacking. Many have the know-how and willingness to do everything that a 40-year-old woman can do in the bedroom. While mentally they’re still children playing pretend with life-sized dollies.

Lacking substantial research, it can only be speculated that this paradox between experience and innocence is the root cause of minor attraction. It’s also the reason many old-school pornographers are in favor of seeing the legal age to do porn raised to 21 (or even higher). Inexperience and innocence make a powerful aphrodisiac for dominance role play. But for those like Epstein and Maxwell, the illusion isn’t good enough, only real innocence will suffice. Too bad lawmakers, in their lack of understanding, lump everything together and have declared that age play is illegal porn.

Comment on age play is illegal porn on twitter

by

The post Age play is illegal porn appeared first on Steele Hard.

Ageism is a form of discrimination that has gained more attention in recent years. It refers to the negative attitudes and stereotypes that are often directed towards people based on their age. Ageism can affect people of any age, but it is most commonly associated with discrimination against older adults. Unfortunately, ageist attitudes are pervasive in many societies, and they can have serious consequences for individuals and communities. It has even been used to affect the outcome of elections.

Nondiscriminatory Sex

Ageism can be overt, subtle or even systemic. In some cases, it may involve overt discrimination, such as when someone is denied a job or promotion because of their age. In other cases, it may be more subtle, such as when someone is assumed to be less capable or less knowledgeable simply because of their age. Then there is systemic ageism, which offers it’s benefits uniquely to persons of a certain age without argument from the community. These attitudes can be harmful in many ways, as they can lead to reduced opportunities, isolation, and frustration; which can manifest as either depression or anger against those profiting from these unjust societal divides.

One of the most significant challenges of ageism is that it can be difficult to identify. Many people who hold ageist attitudes may not even be aware that they are doing so. This is partly because ageism is often reinforced by the media and other cultural factors. For example, older adults are often depicted as slow or forgetful in movies and TV shows, which can reinforce negative stereotypes. The media pushed this prejudice against John McCain’s (REPUBLICAN) presidential candidature by proclaiming that he was too old to be a competent leader; then muzzled any mention of age when Biden (DEMOCRAT), who is older, campaigned from his basement.

Pheromone Infused Soap helps you get laid

Apparently we are making progress in combating ageism. But there is still a long way to go. The federal government has capped military enlistment at 42, with each branch deciding it’s own age cap. Dwindling recruitment and unsuitable candidature among the younger applicants has seen a recent rise in the age that each military force will take on. But the fact remains that despite competitive fitness and stellar mental strength, no one over 41 can join any US military organization; a clear example of systemic ageism. Similarly, many businesses are starting to value of older workers. Recognizing their real world skills, work ethic, and their propensity to leave at home any issues, that might interfere with their performance on the job. But this recent trend barely dents the longstanding practice of workplace ageism and has yet to become universal.

Ageism is a form of discrimination that can have serious consequences for individuals and communities. We must learn about the negative impacts of ageist attitudes, and working to challenge our own assumptions and biases. It also means speaking out when we witness ageist behavior, whether it is in our own communities or in the media. By educating ourselves and challenging our own assumptions, we can all work to create more inclusive and supportive communities for people of all ages.

by

The post Ageism appeared first on Steele Hard.

Consenting adults are fundamental to any healthy sexual encounter. When two individuals agree to engage in sexual activity with one another, it is their right to do so, regardless of any negative opinions or disapproval from others. If they want to fuck bareback (ie: sex without using a condom) then it’s most certainly their right to do so. But others these days seem hell bent on dictating how consent is given. Insisting that consent is invalid unless it is explicit and detailed in the specifics of which acts will be allowed. For most people this bureaucratic intrusion into their personal life is a mood killer. Stopping any hopes of intimacy before it gets started. Because this right to engage in sexual activity is rooted in the principle of individual autonomy and self-determination.

Watch Bareback Videos

Individual autonomy is the idea that individuals have the right to make their own choices and decisions without interference from others. In the realm of sexual activity, we claim domain over our own bodies and sometimes we loan that domain to our partner, to do as s/he pleases, for mutual pleasure. But giving up that autonomy to an uninvolved third party, such as the morality police or the extreme woke mob would have us do, is actually akin coercion, or trafficking. When two adults fuck, they are exercising their individual autonomy and making a choice that is in line with their own desires and values.

External disapproval should have no bearing on the choices adults make when deciding to hook up. But the infiltration has started with sex-ed schooling that is more intensive than reading comprehension. As the latest generation crosses into adulthood, young men are finding the process of defining consenting adults, all too complicated. They miss all but the most overt signals and lose the spontaneity and their interest before achieving a connection with any young women in their age group. This explains the increase in attraction to more maternally aged women, as well as the rise in same sex experiences for both sexes. The negative opinions of others are based on personal beliefs and values that may not align with those of the individuals involved. Furthermore, people have the right to privacy and to keep their sexual experiences and practices confidential.

Pheromone infused soap gets you laid

Some may argue that certain sexual practices are morally or ethically wrong and therefore should not be allowed. However, these opinions are subjective and can vary widely between individuals and cultures. What one person may view as immoral, another may view as acceptable or even desirable. Most women for instance, appreciate a man who not only knows what he wants, but who aggressively pursues it. I am not just talking about sex here; but this self-absurdness is highly desirable in the bedroom. Provided that the woman hasn’t been taught to fear her own sexual desires. So ultimately, nobody that isn’t directly involved in someone’s sexual choices should be influencing them.

Buy Bitcoin /Crypto

Hamilton Steele, an American pornstar and later a French pornographer. Also former program director and events coordinator of Le Beverley, the last porn theater of Paris. He know produces both custom videos for private collectors and self-distribute his own line of gonzo videos.

by

The post Consenting Adults appeared first on Steele Hard.