Fuck project 25, because it’s time pornographers stop behaving like crows sitting on a fence. Our current situation is that there is no shortage of people who are making massive sums of money from the porn industry by promising to either destroy it or protect it. Ambitious politicians and anti-porn lobbyists are becoming billionaires by promising to destroy porn. Meanwhile, free speech activists are equally getting rich by promising to defend us. In the middle are the porn consumers who don’t give a damn as long as they don’t have to pay to watch adult content.

The Rise of Censorship and Regulation in the US Market

The adult entertainment industry, long a haven for free expression and entrepreneurship, faces mounting pressure from regulators, censors, and societal norms. Project 25, a series of guidelines designed to combat human trafficking, will have stifling consequences for pornographers and content creators. Monopolizing on the media’s willful ignorance and bias, the porn industry has been portrayed as the largest source of human trafficking. Porn creators and performers have become a scapegoat. A convenient way to hide the fact that ruling class and wealthy elites have openly engaged in this inhumane criminal activity, with very little public scrutiny.

Famous celebrities and elites such as P Diddy, R. Kelly and Jeffery Epstein have been recently exposed for abuses which seem to have been perpetrated for more than 3 decades. However, in the same way the names on Jeffery Epstein’s client list have never been exposed, the people who helped these men commit their crimes will never be known. Each time the public becomes vocal about knowing the truth, the porn industry is thrust into the spotlight by the media, to play the role of the boogie man.

While the intentions behind Project 25 are may appear to be noble, the restrictions will make it increasingly difficult for those who depend on the adult industry to earn a living. And it should be noted that for every inroad made to censor “adult content”, the tools are being perfected to censor any unwanted voice, video or dissension from any social media user. Monetization is how things are ultimately controlled, precluding already certain vocabulary in an Orwellian sort of reality. Terms like Seggs and un-alive wouldn’t exist if not for the over-censorship. Not to mention that this entire industry sounds like agricultural professionals, having to use terms like corn, eggplant and even pineapples for porn, penis and swingers.

Moreover, major credit card companies have imposed strict limitations on transactions and what kind of porn can be monetized. This makes it challenging for creators to receive payment for their work and fueled the in-pouring of creators to fan platforms. The list of what’s permitted to be shown regularly changes based on the whims of the payment processors. In 1980 a movie called Taboo showed mother and son incest. Despite the fact that neither Kay Parker nor her co-star, Mike Ranger, were related and high demand, similar modern videos are far less likely to be produced. Instead, the bulk of them are labeled as “Step-mother and step-son” in order to avoid censorship and monetization problems.

Crypto as a Solution for Monetization

In response to these challenges, pornographers and content creators should turn to cryptocurrencies as a means of monetizing their work. Crypto offers several advantages over traditional payment methods, including increased anonymity, reducing transaction fees and providing an international currency. By using crypto, creators can bypass the restrictions imposed by credit card companies, enabling them to continue producing and distributing independently their adult products.

The benefit to the consumer is they will no longer face re-occurring billing, as each crypto transaction must be initiated by the purchaser, not the vendor. Therefore fraudulent credit card “banging” would also become a thing of the past. Furthermore, there’s a greater degree of privacy as once crypto is in an anonymous wallet, the banking system cannot see what is being purchased and the porn site can not see who is making the purchase. Which means, for example, a Christian minister who’s career depends on him being heterosexual, can secretly indulge his desires to see gay sex, with far less fear of discovery.

Exploiting Foreign Markets: A World of Opportunity

Hosting a website outside of U.S. jurisdiction can offer significant benefits, particularly in avoiding censorship. Many countries have more lenient regulations regarding freedom of speech, allowing content creators to express themselves without the constant threat of suppression. By choosing a host in a jurisdiction with stronger protections for free expression, individuals can safeguard their websites from arbitrary take-downs and governmental interference. This not only promotes a more open exchange of ideas, but also encourages innovation and creativity, as people feel empowered to share diverse perspectives. Additionally, hosting abroad can provide a layer of anonymity and privacy, further protecting users from surveillance and censorship efforts. Overall, opting for offshore hosting can be a strategic move for those seeking to maintain their voice in an increasingly regulated digital landscape.

As the US market becomes increasingly hostile to adult content creators, foreign markets should be considered to expand their audience and increase revenue. By creating content tailored to the tastes and preferences of foreign cultures, pornographers and content creators can efficiently exploit these untapped markets. One key to success in foreign markets is the adaptation of content to local languages and cultural norms. By producing adult content in multiple languages and catering to the diverse preferences of global audiences, creators can significantly increase their potential customer base.

The adult entertainment industry faces significant challenges due to increasing regulation and censorship. However, there is hope in the form of crypto-based solutions and the untapped potential of foreign markets. By embracing these opportunities, the industry can continue to thrive and innovate, ensuring that adult content creators can continue to express themselves freely and profitably. It is time for the industry to abandon the restrictive confines of the US market and explore the global potential of adult entertainment. Ironically, this maybe a win-win scenario for those who are currently trying to restructure western culture. By sanctioning what is acceptable pornography, they are asking those who want to make or see something other than copy-cat content to leave.

The door is being held open, time to wave goodbye and say Fuck Project 25

—

—

Discuss Fuck Project 25 on X /twitter

by

The post Fuck Project 25 appeared first on Steele Hard.

Consenting adults are fundamental to any healthy sexual encounter. When two individuals agree to engage in sexual activity with one another, it is their right to do so, regardless of any negative opinions or disapproval from others. If they want to fuck bareback (ie: sex without using a condom) then it’s most certainly their right to do so. But others these days seem hell bent on dictating how consent is given. Insisting that consent is invalid unless it is explicit and detailed in the specifics of which acts will be allowed. For most people this bureaucratic intrusion into their personal life is a mood killer. Stopping any hopes of intimacy before it gets started. Because this right to engage in sexual activity is rooted in the principle of individual autonomy and self-determination.

Watch Bareback Videos

Individual autonomy is the idea that individuals have the right to make their own choices and decisions without interference from others. In the realm of sexual activity, we claim domain over our own bodies and sometimes we loan that domain to our partner, to do as s/he pleases, for mutual pleasure. But giving up that autonomy to an uninvolved third party, such as the morality police or the extreme woke mob would have us do, is actually akin coercion, or trafficking. When two adults fuck, they are exercising their individual autonomy and making a choice that is in line with their own desires and values.

External disapproval should have no bearing on the choices adults make when deciding to hook up. But the infiltration has started with sex-ed schooling that is more intensive than reading comprehension. As the latest generation crosses into adulthood, young men are finding the process of defining consenting adults, all too complicated. They miss all but the most overt signals and lose the spontaneity and their interest before achieving a connection with any young women in their age group. This explains the increase in attraction to more maternally aged women, as well as the rise in same sex experiences for both sexes. The negative opinions of others are based on personal beliefs and values that may not align with those of the individuals involved. Furthermore, people have the right to privacy and to keep their sexual experiences and practices confidential.

Pheromone infused soap gets you laid

Some may argue that certain sexual practices are morally or ethically wrong and therefore should not be allowed. However, these opinions are subjective and can vary widely between individuals and cultures. What one person may view as immoral, another may view as acceptable or even desirable. Most women for instance, appreciate a man who not only knows what he wants, but who aggressively pursues it. I am not just talking about sex here; but this self-absurdness is highly desirable in the bedroom. Provided that the woman hasn’t been taught to fear her own sexual desires. So ultimately, nobody that isn’t directly involved in someone’s sexual choices should be influencing them.

Buy Bitcoin /Crypto

Hamilton Steele, an American pornstar and later a French pornographer. Also former program director and events coordinator of Le Beverley, the last porn theater of Paris. He know produces both custom videos for private collectors and self-distribute his own line of gonzo videos.

by

The post Consenting Adults appeared first on Steele Hard.

In an era of political correctness and anti-hatred, age discrimination is both the highly profitable and the dumbest openly perpetuated prejudice . It’s absolutely moronic to discriminate against someone that’s older than us, because everyone one of us is aging and sooner or later, we’ll eventually be part of that rejected generation. Segregation based on age elevates the unrealistic optimism and innocence of youth, while negating the experience and wisdom that comes with time. Governments use divide and conquer politics to keep the youth from learning from those that are older, while corporations use ageism to sell their products and services.

The way age discrimination is used by the porn industry is both good and bad. One argument can be made that the business demonstrates that someone over 60 can still be very physically attractive and very sexual. However, the age represented is NOT always the age of the performer; pornographers are creating a fantasy, and rarely worry about truth in their story-lines. The other side of the debate is that teen and barely legal porn often encourages attraction to the prepubescent look. But since we are all over 18, it is also coincidentally the only legal release for such obsessions. Therefore, whatever beneficial aspects pornography might have, are always offset by its negative opposite and there’s always at least one negative.

We’re in the midst of a societal revolution or, depending on your point of view, a cultural war. Wokeism is openly violent and oppressive, defending its desire to destroy thousands of years of hard learned social wisdom. From the moment our mothers’ drop us off at daycare, our age divisions commence. They follow us through school, and as we reach adulthood, social groups and government programs abound which continue this separation. It’s no wonder that age discrimination has become ingrained into society, we have so little interaction across the generations, that we fail to relate to one another. As the focus continues to shift from family and individual success to group identity, the governments’ self-serving policies exacerbate the social problems that it claims to be addressing. Only the unintelligent or someone purposely choosing to not see the manipulation by the mass media and politicians would have the gall to say that they weren’t always aware of the situation, even before the arrival of the woke conflict.

Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water

They protest racism, they protest sexism, they protest for gay rights and they protest for body autonomy. Young plus sized females got the cover of Cosmopolitan in February 2021. However, if you want to see a female athlete in her 60s similarly celebrated, you’ll have to turn to Senior Marketed magazines. Age discrimination affects all races and sexes; only the most wealthy are able to escape its societal isolation. Even when the government does seem to make recompense to the older population, when it comes to things like the housing problem (created in part by the ever growing government who contributes to general inflation with poor fiscal practices, while subjecting home-owners to skyrocketing property taxes to cover their own bureaucratic paychecks); retirees can find themselves sequestered in communities purposely designed to accommodate their age group. I am not talking about nursing homes, I am speaking of the HUD regulated properties which prevent grandparents from raising their own grandchildren because where they are allowed to live, children are not welcome. When a government sanctions programs by age they are practicing ageism and they are further isolating and making vulnerable the older population.

Society has come to think of the elderly as losing their cognitive function (a documented consequence of isolation), having poor physical health, and being past their ability to make a substantial contribution to the workforce. But when the elderly are given purpose, have always taken responsibility for their physical health and have nurturing relationships with their family and communities, these problems are rarely evident; an 80 year old can have the same vitality as a 30 year old. Just as we expect less in physical and mental health of individuals as they age; we similarly expect less maturity and independence from minors than we did even a generation or two ago. Unfortunately, people will live up to those inadequate expectations. Too many people have been led to believe that we should expect less from ourselves as we age, that we should slow down and strive less, and believing this fallacy, it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. The tremendous consequences of age discrimination, are felt in throughout a society which has culturally embraced them, and the subsequent list of hypocrisies is exhaustively long and poorly documented, despite being well known.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result. With that in mind, it’s also true that history repeats itself. Therefore, we live in a mad world and nothing is going to get better until we stop destroying millennia old human knowledge and learn from it. This will never happen as long as we allow the media, the entertainment industry and government to create a culture that praises the inexperience of youth, fears aging and shuns everyone over a certain age. In a moral society, we see each other as individuals and not by categories. Group identity politics is utterly the most bigoted evolution of society. Ultimately, the only things that should be scrutinized or weighted as important are someone’s knowledge, their skills and accomplishments. So if a 60 year old can pass ALL the required tests to join the military, that a healthy 20 year old must… They should be allowed to sign up and age discrimination be dammed!

by

The post Age discrimination appeared first on Steele Hard.

Taking a selfie, along with copies of your government ID is now being requested by sites for affiliate programs. Business with those who make you uncomfortable is best minimized, or avoided altogether. While moronic behavior has long been a sign of an unsafe business venture. Without a doubt, each of these sites are able to “justify” and provide “reasons” why they’re requiring selfies, but bureaucrats can find reasons and justifications for literally everything that they do. Regardless of if they are employed by the government or in private sector, creating excuses for their idiotic bureaucracy is the one skill that all functionaries have in common.

Any businessperson with an iota of commonsense will quickly point out that paperwork eats in to their profits. For the intelligent, it’s a question of how much should they tolerate before they move on to easier and more profitable people to work with. So for many, taking a selfie can very much be where they draw the line, and they will dump companies making such a requirement. Unfortunately, alternative options are dwindling, as Big Tech’s oligarchy grows.

Our options become even more limited when you consider that there is no shortage of people in developing nations willing jump through hoops, taking a selfie, or whatever else is requested for a fraction of the payoff we expect. The 3rd world sees the Internet like a promised land of potential revenue, and many companies are happy to replace each Western partner lost with dozens more in non-occidental nations. Long term, they’ll be able to pay these new colleagues less money, thereby increasing their profits. No doubt that many international government circles are betting that they can turn impoverished nations into richer ones and when they become too expensive, they’ll turn their eyes back towards us, who in desperation will cooperate with whatever they ask.

The backbone of tyranny is bureaucratic policies. They may be simply doing business, but they are creating serfdom for society. Tyrants, including private sector ones, are short sighted morons because they seldom look towards creating anything of quality or endurance, in either their products or commercial endeavors. The lure of easy money and prestige is hard to refuse, but it’s a game that the majority of players end up losing. Cooperating with tyranny is perhaps even more short-sighted and stupid because your role as only a pawn has been made abundantly clear. Perhaps taking a selfie “for security reasons” is an innocuous request, but it’s not going to stop there, so don’t be surprised when they demand bio-metric data or worse. You’re in control today; be careful what you give away, or you may lose that control.

by

The post Taking a selfie appeared first on Steele Hard.

In order to better satisfy the current market, it’s become necessary to appease many different people, so we have decided to donate a portion of sales to charity. This is a complete change to our normal business model which was predicated on the old fashion idea of minimizing costs and maximizing profits, only worrying about the law and nothing else. Unfortunately, this change in policy must start with talent because they’re really the only people complaining at the lack of social activism and/or political agenda. Well, to be completely honest, this will only affect our porn talent because our consumers are too busy stroking their cocks to care who or what we support; they only bitch when they can’t jerk off.

Porn performers will now be separated into two different groups.

Group A is the socially concerned, aka social justice warriors, more recently self identified as Democrat supporters. No longer will these bleeding-hearts be paid for their sexual performances in front of our cameras. Instead the donated portion of sales to charity will be an amount equal to how much they would have normally been paid. In lieu of actual money, we’re now providing performers the means to show their support by giving them a way to FUCK FOR THEIR CAUSE. For example, if racism is their biggest worry, then we will make certain that every cock that goes in them is attached to a person of color. While individuals with white/caucasian penises will be tied up and forced to sit in a corner as punishment for their toxic masculinity and white privilege.

Group B is comprised of the patriots, also frequently called red hats but generally known as Republicans. Unlike Group A, these people will be paid, but by check, put in the mail with the upmost care like their votes. Orange tinged tan lines will be encouraged. And we expect them to show their sexual enthusiasm with the emphatic volume of Alex Jones. A copy of the 2nd amendment will be included in the model releases and they’ll be allowed to display and talk about their guns during sex. Needless to say, these heartless rednecks will get everything they want, including a bonus can of paint to spruce up their trailer-home.

Be careful when giving a portion of sales to charity

All jokes aside, at a recent networking event a comment was made that we would donate a portion of sales to charity. Known politically to be an anarchist hoping for the implosion of all government, it obviously wasn’t a serious statement; we’re pornographers after-all. Unfortunately there were clients that took it seriously and they wanted to know which charity. Good business sense and experience should have dropped the issue, instead of trying to pursue the matter. Within a week, a handful of clients found excuses to limit their business with us. Obviously, the charity mentioned wasn’t viewed favorably by everyone. Since the donation of a portion of sales to charity was going to a cause that they didn’t support, they chose to demonstrate their disapproval by giving their money to someone else. This wouldn’t have been an issue had only the other side decided to do business with us because we might financially help support a group that they liked.

Donating a portion of sales to charity should only be given to those organizations that are overwhelmingly safe such as combating illiteracy or hunger. The smart business man remains resolutely neutral in face of all social and political issues. Politics and social problems are a double edged sword, meaning that you risk to anger just as many people as you hope to seduce with your virtue signalling. It’s most often safer to simply keep your opinions to yourself and keep your business out of all social and political controversies. And maybe also save sarcastic jokes for your inner circle of friends, because not doing so these days, professionally is no laughing matter.

by

The post Portion of Sales to Charity appeared first on Steele Hard.

The Internet has ushered in technological tyranny, where like an Orwellian Big Brother, it hears, sees, everything we do and it can even reach out and strangle us. Our communication is dominated by the tech industries, who hold themselves out as protectors of the free world by running an Internet Blacklist Database. Known as the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT), this database’s official purpose is prevent the proliferation of information through their platforms of what they deem to be “terrorist and violent extremist exploitation”. The four founding members of Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter and Youtube are vying to get other internet companies to sign on, with them and their affiliate properties. Independently owned AirBnB, Amazon, Discord, WordPress, Mailchimp and Tumblr have already joined their ranks in this censorship endeavor. The companies involved in the this technological tyranny do so by covering all aspects of modern communications. From the obvious social media, and messaging platforms, to photo sharing, cloud storage, interactive video games, advertising and even emerging AI communication technologies like DeepThink (Alphabet) and Nuance (Microsoft).

Technological tyranny is enforced by a collective that monitors our activities

All members of the GIFCT form a Big Brother collective, sharing information concerning activities on their respective platforms that may be considered in support of terrorism or violent extremism. Where the danger for regular folk exists, is in the label violent extremist, an easily adopted moniker that can be thrown around by anyone who’s authority is being challenged. We may have a recent example of this in the Trucker’s convoy. Whether or not the Trucker’s demands represented the desires of the placid, obedient, and over 80% vaccinated Canadian citizens, or that they were a fringe group of hateful extremists as Canadian Leader Justin Trudeau called them, remains to be seen. What we need to take away from this is that Trudeau was able to not only keep them from receiving support from GoFundMe, but he also froze back accounts, and even traced Bitcoin transactions, of both the Trucker’s and anyone who supported them. If it weren’t for the present day technological tyranny, much of this information would not have been accessible to the Canadian government.

Because the rules of GIFCT include anyone facilitating or making a financial contribution to any terrorist or extremist organization; everyone who so much as voiced their support has opened themselves up to scrutiny and possible future consequences. We must understand that this technological tyranny means if the powers that be don’t get what they want, the voices of dissension can now suffer more life disrupting ramifications, like having their money made inaccessible, because of the inter-connectivity of the tech giant subsidiary assets.

The plight of the end-user who sees his comments disappear, his account suspended or a complete ban from a platform, has often fallen on death ears, as other users “flag” content which is competitive to them or supports an opposing opinion. This juvenile squabbling, where little brother tattles to Big brother on his middle siblings, is not just an inconvenience of trying to plead one’s case to the administration of the relative platform. User reporting is, in fact, a primary mechanism used by GIFCT to hunt down offensive material. We have seen this played out in an ever increasing political divide between the Dems and Republicans. The technological tyranny clearly does not favor President Donald Trump and even banned him entirely last year from Facebook, Twitter and Youtube. What’s more, alternative platforms are quickly swallowed up, bought out, or as with Parler, made unavailable by blocking the app. Parler and it’s users were identified as Trump supporters, so both Apple and Android removed it’s app from their stores. Google Play Store, which deals in all the Android apps, is a subsidiary of Google, as is and founding member of GIFCT YouTube.

How long until we’re bullied?

These techies have long treated traditional business models with disdain, and have drilled an “adapt or die” mantra into the minds of everyone reluctant to move away from in person transactions to third party dependency. But the recent global quarantine, was for most who still held out, the proverbial nail in the coffin. With so many housebound, for so long, this adaptation was forced upon every industry. Restaurants and groceries are delivered, doctors and therapists are virtual, and all commerce and advertising goes through the internet or it goes out of business. Technological tyranny, it seems, is like a school yard bully, picking on those who don’t step in line and ensuring himself a piece of the action from everyone who does succumb to his tactics. This not only means a significant drop in face to face exchanges, but the liberty-guaranteeing use of cash is falling by the wayside.

When we don’t use cash, every transaction is traceable. Those behind the technological tyranny use this information to profile us for further advertising, but it can also be used to connect you with organizations, which may one day fall out of favor with the establishment. Worse for most of us, is the fact that third party transactions means someone else handles our money and they may not always be willing to pass it along. Paypal is infamous for seizing funds, and freezing accounts. There is also a long history of adult performers, seeing money earned on camming sites disappear, before they get transferred into their respective accounts. Not to mention that a cashless society relies heavily on credit cards and the credit card processing is subject to all sorts of hold-backs on funds. Take Square for instance, (run by Jack Dorsey, the founder of Twitter), in their terms of service they state, “We may require a Reserve for any reason related to your use of the Services. The Reserve will be in an amount as reasonably determined by us to cover potential losses to Square. The Reserve may be raised, reduced or removed at any time by Square, in its soul discretion.” This loosely defined access to your funds (both from sales revenues and in your linked bank account) is becoming standard operation for these third-party processors, and is exceptionally scary when you consider that the TOS also give Square the right to keep any funds in their favor from processing errors that go undisputed for 30 days.

We have to think of these tech giants not as some altruistic organization for the betterment of humanity, but self-serving entities capable of attacking anyone whose internet activity does not fall in line with the desired behaviors. Don’t kid yourself, while this may not yet be fully unleashed, it’s naive to believe that it never will be. The billionaires in charge of these mega corporations do not have our best interest. History has shown that the rich and powerful will do whatever they can get away with to keep their profits rising. We have become way too reliant on technological middlemen, who can literally direct our business by controlling the access that others have to our content and/ or advertising. And with the platforms that distribute our content and / or process our payments, we have the added worry of having our funds seized. Anyone who refuses to acknowledge the risks of these two realities shouldn’t be surprised when one day the technological tyranny disrupts their personal or professional livelihood. Don’t believe me? Then I challenge you to get through a day, a week, or even a month without utilizing any product of Facebook (META),Google (Alphabet), Microsoft, or twitter (Block).

by

The post Technological Tyranny appeared first on Steele Hard.

We have already witnessed the partisan bias of Big-Tech and the Earn It Act will essentially empower Big Tech to become the right arm of Big Brother. On the surface it claims to be all about protecting children, which is a justifiable reason for legislation, but this bill is NOT the solution we need or want. Big Tech can not be trusted and this Act is nothing more than the government becoming better bedfellows with the sites and apps that everyone uses to communicate. It puts the onus on the Internet service providers to do everything in their power to prevent the exchange and distribution of child porn, renamed (CSAM) Child Sexual Abuse Material. In doing so Big Tech is being given authority to access your private online activities and interactions. Their unbounded license to ignore privacy laws is actually proposed as a contingency to remaining protected from their own prosecution as a publisher.

If the Earn It Act were nothing more than a quid pro quo agreement to stamp out child porn, its opposition would fall on deaf ears, but so much more is at play. First, we can not rely on Big Tech to use this access uniquely for the prevention of CSAM; they have a history of overstepping their authority. But worse, the bill suggests that law enforcement (Big Brother’s left hook), have a built in backdoor access to all communication. All fully encrypted sites, apps, sources would have to write into their main program a means of accessing all data, and provide this access to law enforcement. making everyone open to scrutiny, robbing people of their privacy and freedom to communicate.

The Earn It Act also will do nothing to protect the child exploitation that occurs outside of the Internet. Relatives and teacher’s who abuse their position are not likely to be stupid enough to be distributing CSAM over the Internet. Not to mention that recent criminal cases involving Jeffery Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell, have surely shed light on the fact that the rich and powerful don’t need the internet to fuel their lustful exploitation of children.

Indeed, with the Earn It Act and its focus on CSAM, the government is willfully avoiding giving resources to the many other ways children are exploited. Is it by design that these rich and powerful lawmakers are holding themselves out as protectors of the innocent when their ACT actually enables other child exploitation by diverting resources? Or is it really,more insidious, like so many recent government power expansions, and not actually about protecting any children at all, but rather to be used to backdoor spying on every citizen who uses an app or the internet to exchange information with anyone? The government is guilty of an abuse of powers, putting constitutional rights on hold for mandates they themselves often ignored. How much worse could this get when private conversations are no longer private ? Imagine if someone’s angry venting is used against them for a conviction of hate crimes, or sedition ?

We have been witness to the abuse of the power of tech and media companies who control the narrative and cancel or vilify anyone with a counter opinion. Can we trust these companies, who abuse their power in relation to public commentary, with sanctioned access to our private interactions? If the Earn It Act is passed by the power hungry bureaucrats who fear non-compliance from their citizens, how long until the once highly encrypted protections on banking and other sensitive data can be easily hacked because of built in access points? And then with the movement away from real cash to digital currencies; how long before your life savings disappear?

There is a better alternative to protect kids

Unfortunately, the Earn It Act is just another bureaucratic nightmare, proposing a 19 member panel of The Attorney General, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, and someone from the FCC (Federal Communications Commission), with 16 additional politician appointed “experts” in child exploitation, consumer protections, and computer security. Better to adopt the alternative proposal the Invest in Child Safety Act which would focus on empowering, and funding law enforcement specifically to Enforce and Protect Against Child Sexual Exploitation. This would be headed by people with a proven background (experience) in prosecuting and investigating these crimes. The idea is to literally invest in the current organizations that are in the business of protecting children and going after their assailants. The groups involved would be focused on protecting children. addressing missing children, street kids, as well as helping identified victims. It wouldn’t overlook the Internet problem either, with a two fold attack proposed to go after CSAM. First $15 Million, and more jobs are proposed for the technologically competent engineers and analysts who weed through technology company leads on CSAM content discovered online, And another $60 Million for an Internet Crimes task force to hunt down and bring in the perpetrators. Obviously the Invest in Child Safety Act is a superior proposal for protecting children and our rights….but are you going to do anything to stop the Earn It Act from being the one that is implemented?

by

The post Earn It Act appeared first on Steele Hard.

Many of us joked that we wanted to be paid per pound when doing the fat fetish videos. It wasn’t so very long ago that in the mainstream porn industry, new male talent had to prove that their cocks were reliable. This meant that we had to take whatever work was offered us and sometimes that work entailed the fat fetish videos. Even I had to do +400lbs woman in a tub of raw hamburger meat. To this day, when I close my eyes I can still smell the stench of the meat and see the end of the scene where my partner’s face was dripping with sperm while she fried up handfuls of the meat and started eating it. It was a major “yuck” moment in my career and I wasn’t paid per pound. Also, it was the first time I changed my stage name, in order to distance myself from the event.

Gang-bangs, bukkakes, multiple guy cream pie and other assorted group sex acts are the norm when you’re just starting out. But in an industry where a man earns only 20% of what a woman commands per scene, even when we do break through to become recognized talent, we can often find ourselves having to go back to doing the difficult jobs. However, for most of us, it’s one thing to be willing to perform in a bukkake for $100 or a gang bang for $200, everyone does that once in a while. But it’s entirely a different situation, when we’re asked to have 1-on-1 sex with an extremely morbidly obese woman for $100 to $200. You see, as the general population grows at the waistline, what constitutes Fat fetish porn, is more and more extreme. In my day, anyone with more than 100lbs of extra mass could have been used for this fetish. Today, 100 lbs overweight can be used in regular porn. As for Fat fetish porn, the bigger the better, which means often times the camera crew goes to the home of the talent because she rarely leaves the house. So you can understand why male talent, not sharing this fetish, would want to opt to be paid per pound.

Most women in porn can easily avoid having any kind of sex that she’s not comfortable doing, which often includes not working with male talent who she doesn’t find attractive. On top of that, when any female agrees to a gang-bang, etc. she’s earning in excess of $1000. Plus there are more opportunities to make money for women than there are for men. Rest assured that those discussing the gender wage gap are overlooking the porn industry. Women even make more for a girl girl scene than most male talent gets in a day. Female talent never has to worry about being paid per pound, because they’re paid by the dick.

For some obesity is sexy

Despite the public’s continued denial, Covid is slowly bringing to attention that the majority of Americans have a weight problem. So it should come as no surprise that chubby lovers is a huge market and it’s growing because it represents modern day America. In this case it can be said that the USA has paid per pound for its success. So while there’s no such thing as a healthy obese person, in porn, there is a healthy market for obesity. According to a Harris Poll made last year, 42% of people reported an average weight gain of 29 lbs from pandemic lifestyle changes. Since the last statistics calculated for America’s obesity rates were pre-pandemic and over 40% of the population was found to be obese according to the CDC, we can expect that number to have increased. Making the percentage of Americans who are carrying around at least a few extra pounds probably around 75% as estimated by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Male pornstars are a rare breed. We’re able to get a solid erection in front of others and have sex with complete strangers whom we have no interest in. Having sex with a morbidly obese person, isn’t easy for most men, just physically working with that much body mass has it’s own difficulties. especially when they find so much fat to be decidedly unappealing. Male talent used to laugh that we wanted to be paid per pound and pornographer’s fear that it could become a reality if American continues to get bigger and the fat fucks genre keeps growing at the current rate. Imagine instead of paying a meat puppet $100 to $200 for a scene, now having to pay per pound. A 300 or 400 lb woman would be a whole lot more expensive to shoot, especially if the scene calls for more than one on one sex, which as this moves from fetish to commonplace is the next step in the porn evolution.

There’s someone for everyone in this world. When it comes to weight, my motto has always been “a little cushion for the pushing” is more fun than a slutty anorexic. So I do make a distinction between overweight and obese. But my personal preference is for tall, lean athletic women, which makes everything outside of that description work to some extent. By and large, I don’t really care how big a person is; what I don’t tolerate however is people who have these avoidable health issues lecturing me about my health. Or worse, making me responsible for it, while freaking out that I am a some sort of bigot, when my flippant response is that they might not be so afraid of dying if they had spent half the time working out that they do on tv and social media. If you ask me, fat shaming is not a bad thing if it makes someone look at themselves honestly. Frankly, I am getting tired of being asked to participate in others’ self-delusions. Therefore it doesn’t really matter if I am paid per pound or someone is paying for a pounding, as a pornstar, I do what I must to make a living. Being attracted to the person I have sex with is not in my job description. The only thing one needs to take away from this, is in the real world everyone has hundreds of pounds to move around… either to stay fit by lifting barbells in a gym, or getting stuck with the burden of carrying the weight, everyday and with every single movement.

by

The post Paid per pound appeared first on Steele Hard.

If you are following the news at all these days you would believe that managing misinformation is the crucial altruistic purpose of media venues, both social media and traditional news. In reality we are witnessing the birth-pangs of an Orwellian Ministry of Truth. When we allow a third party to decide what is ok for us to know and what is not, we are essentially allowing them to do the thinking for us. Not only denying ourselves the opportunity to engage in critical thinking, but trusting that said third party is truly infallible. omniscient and benevolent enough to be allowed to make this decision on our behalf. Misinformation is nothing more than a fancy word for lies, but when the media uses it, to ascribe everything outside of the preferred narrative, that narrative becomes propaganda.

The concept of misinformation comes from the Russian word dezinformatsiya, which was according to Wikipedia, a government propaganda program whose purpose was to create false information whose source was also falsely associated. It’s sort of like a false flag operation but using the media to sway public opinion. Here’s an example… Going back to Nazi Germany, Hitler didn’t have full control of the nation at first, and the communist party was his parliamentary opposition party. He called for a reelection, then the parliament building was torched. Immediately the communists were blamed, it was decreed a terrorist act signaling a communist uprising and in the upcoming weeks the communist party credibility was destroyed and members were villanized while, Hitler’s Nazi’s gained full control over the government processes, law making, right revoking, property confiscating, etc

A media today is possibly even more powerful than it was in Hitler’s era. It dominates our lives, our social interactions, the screens at work, at our gyms and in our homes. It stimulates our eyes, our ears and especially our emotions. This emotional response ripe with dopamine is a powerful tool that has split the population into rival gangs. Reason goes out the window, facts become are irrelevant, and misinformation peddlers are labeled far-right extremists. Those self elected to the task of managing misinformation, label others as a consequence of questioning the status quo or choosing one’s own narrative, even when based on personal experience, and it has nothing to do with voting history or vaccine status. A population divided is already half conquered, because we attack each other instead of the forces that truly disrupt our lives and livelihood. But this is NOT about Trump vs Biden…heck the main debate today is mandates versus precaution when it comes to dealing with Covid and both political leaders are on the SAME team when it comes to the vaccine. Trump continues to peddle the shot at every speaking engagement, it was after-all his “baby”, he is the one behind “operation warp speed” and allowed an experimental pharmaceutical solution on the market before it was fully tested. Biden just takes things one step further by trying to mandate that everyone takes it. And those managing misinformation? Well, they don’t want us to know enough to make an informed decision, because they think we are all too stupid to understand anything that they don’t tell us… Truthfully, from my perspective watching this fiasco unfold, I can see where they might get the idea that people are too stupid to make their own decisions.

A feeble mind can be overindulged

The brain like any muscle in the body responds better to good nutrition and exercise, than it does to sweets and passive activity. And just like an armchair athlete, we often think we know something because we agree with something we are told. Unfortunately even the so called educated are not exempt. So called college graduates have been increasingly unable to read at their degree certified grade level. In the 90s already less than half of the graduates showed reading proficiency of regular text , their understanding worsened when it came to reading documents. The number of graduates who regurgitate, but can’t understand what they are reading grew from there. As a consequence, so called experts, may not be. Which leaves the question, who then is managing misinformation? Those who have an analytical understanding of the articles on which they pass judgement, or is their measure merely if the information contradicts their personal beliefs? We all must be diligent and seek data, numbers, not conjecture and hyperbole.

We have been intellectually lobotomized by adjective heavy reports that quote things in such a way as to confound the average consumer. When it comes to keeping a public terrified of Covid, case numbers are quoted (without consistent testing parameters – but that’s another issue) and we never hear about how many people got better from it. Actually the way things have been presented is akin to convincing the public that the more lottery tickets are sold, the better the chances of their numbers coming up. And although death totals are more pertinent, they too must be kept in perspective to real risk? For instance. how healthy were those who Covid took out ? Were they physically active or just waiting to die ? (Sorry it seems cold, but with 80% of the deaths in America hitting those in their retirement years, one needs to ask, the hard questions.) Science up until recently was about asking those troublesome questions, challenging other people’s findings. The offspring research accounting for more parameters, and fine tuning things as a result. Conversely, when everything is excepted as is, errors are not caught, and progress dies. Sure, we’ll get subsequent “boosters”, but is a the fiscally timed development by someone with a monopoly, really the best solution?

Life isn’t about always feeling good, it’s about experiences. Bad things will happen, they are opportunities to reflect and learn. Introspection and reading are how we exercise a mind. Fail to do this and our thoughts become clouded, our attention distracted, eventually the lethargy overtakes us and we allow someone else to do the thinking for us, telling us what to believe. Managing misinformation is not the job of some faceless institution, it is the duty of every freedom loving free-thinking soul. It is an individual responsibility, to be judged against your own personal experiences, observations and discoveries. Failure to do so invites deception to control you, dictatorship to guide you and binds you to a chain gang like existence that will eventually even rob you the hope of escape. Think of this as the last decision you make. Believe what I am suggesting and get off the proverbial couch and start training your mind to think again or don’t and let you brain be directed by another to do what’s best for them, not you.

by

The post Managing Misinformation appeared first on Steele Hard.

According to yahoo news:

“More than 30 women sued Pornhub on Thursday, accusing it of violating federal sex trafficking laws, distributing child pornography, racketeering and other crimes.

The suit alleges that Pornhub’s parent company, MindGeek — and its constellation of porn brands — is a criminal enterprise that purchases, launders and uploads illegal content often obtained through human trafficking and sexual assault.”

Over the years I’ve heard my fair share of rumors about pornhub laundering money and illegal content. I’ve never been a fan of the user generated porn content. Especially when it’s policed by a community standards business model. Personally, I would have preferred to see a profit sharing approach with producers and production companies. When you deal directly with civilians, you’re going to be bullshit screwed over sooner or later. It appears now that controversy and law suits are fast becoming a business expense for Mindgeek.

In an era dominated by social justice warriors, it’s not a good time for porn professionals to fall under public scrutiny. All it’s going to take is one freaky colored hair Megan Rapinoe type to step forward with allegations that underage incest videos of her were uploaded to the Internet and all hell will break lose. Cable news will go bat shit crazy over the story, congress will call for a moment of silence and some razor company will manufacture a DIY cut off your dick kit to combat evil toxic masculinity. And you have to be a self-deluding fool if you don’t believe that those angry social justice warriors would purposely create and upload underage incest videos just to trap Pornhub.

I’m being a realistic bastard when I say that the social justice obsessed would go as far as to film themselves having sex with their own 8 year old child. Modern society not only is in the middle of a pandemic of mentally unstable crazies, but it’s also under assault by numerous power hungry self-righteous militant groups. Add to this a very dumbed down public, where anyone with common sense finds him/herself in the minority. Country singer Kenny Rogers sang, “know when to hold them… know when to fold them… know when to walk away and know when to run.” Well, if life is a poker game, these days anyone with a good brain is playing their cards very close to their chest.

Then again, I’m just one independent focused on how I’m going to navigate my stretch of the Mississippi river. Mindgeek has a lot more money, intellectual talent and contacts than I do. So maybe this lawsuit and all the previous problems are nothing more than the proverbial fly in the ointment to them. What I can say is that I’m no stranger to porn controversies and so I wish them the best.

by

The post Finally the end for pornhub? appeared first on Steele Hard.