OnlyFans and Child Porn frequently find themselves in bed together. From anal sex scenes with little boys, to fellatio scenes with infants, it’s often available on OnlyFans to those who go looking for it. While the general public is blissfully ignorant to the severity of this problem, the callous profiteers are making money together distributing CSAM.

For seven months photos and videos of children being raped were exchanged without hindrance.

Child Porn: aka Child Sex Abuse Material (CSAM), fills almost every corner of the Internet. It lurks in the shadows of all social media and every platforms which allow the public to upload content to is flooded with it. Like a broken record, the corporations who own these sites continuously repeat their slogans that they’re “Doing everything possible to protect children” and they “Report and cooperate with the appropriate agencies.” – Considering the amount money that can be made and the time it takes to remove the CSAM, are they really motivated to protect the innocent or is this just another part of doing business?

It took seven months for OnlyFans when self-reported child abuse images. In the case of Christopher Varney, 60, of Florida and Abel Esquivel, 35, of San Francisco. People could view images which ranged from of anal sex with little boys to oral with enfants. During those seven months, the level of degradation and abuse exchanged via members-only access, only augmented.

OnlyFans assures that it is committed to stamping out CSAM, and it’s apparently cooperating with NCMEC. (National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.) But the proliferation of CSAM is like a global game of wack a mole, only a few dozen are flagged every month by OnlyFans. Meanwhile the platform approves over 60K new creator accounts each month, and has since at least 2021. (That’s almost a million new channels of distribution to watch every year). With this level of continued expansion it’s impossible for OnlyFans to be able to monitor all accounts. What’s more often times when CSAM accounts are discovered, the person registered is NOT who is using it. So all the registration process was legit, but the content within the account did not represent the person who was verified to use it.

That is how Ethan Diaz, a then 21 year old from NJ ended up exploiting a 16 year old Florida girl. He befriended her online and soon he was asking his “girlfriend” for nude pics and solo videos which he posted to an abandoned account on OnlyFans. When he came to Florida, he took the girl into his airbnb to record real sex videos with her. In her absence, her parents discovered nude images and correspondence with Diaz on her phone, and immediately called the Police. Over the course of 3 short months, he was able to make about $10K posting images and video of the girl to OnlyFans, driving traffic from Snapchat and Discord. Diaz has since plea bargained for a 5 year sentence, but what about OnlyFans ? Keily Blair OF CEO said in a TEDx talk in 2023: “We moderate all of the content on our platform. Every text, every message, every audio clip, every livestream, everything gets moderated. We see everything. We’re doing it to keep our community safe.”  So should they not be accountable for monitoring when accounts suddenly go active again and the images don’t match ?

The double standard

Ask any legacy porn industry veteran, law enforcement would have quickly shut down their productions pending investigations. Depending on the circumstances, those involved in the production faced possible criminal charges. Yet, law enforcement appears to have no desire to get involved with the big tech porn industry and only pursues easy to arrest individuals. – OnlyFans corporate officers are untouchable.

Allowing the public to upload homemade porn was always a bad idea. The old school porn veterans instinctively knew this fact. But for them, if further emphasis was needed, they only had to look in their mail bags and watch the homemade DVD mailed to them or look outside their office windows at the creepy guy who brought a young girl for them to see. Since the wake-up call of the 1980s with Traci Lords, legacy pornographers dealt with child exploiters on a grass roots level and albeit, most weren’t above using a baseball bat.

Sites like OnlyFans are leaving a highway sized trail of abused children. Soviet era dictator Joseph Stalin said, “A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.” This concept is easy to understand, the average person can identify and feel empathy for a single victim. But, when the number of victims exceed a certain amount, they’re de-humanized and turned into a simple math equation. The public feels nothing for them and therefore takes no interest.

All victims have a name.

Morally and legally, a child victim shouldn’t and can’t have their name published. But this doesn’t make them any less human or lessen the abuse and exploitation they’ve endured.  Their histories should carry weight and meaning in the public’s heart. Seeing the abused and not a statistic goes a very long way to prevent rape from happening to others. – On the other hand, turning victims into stats only benefits corporate and political greed.

One Boston boy at 15 started dating a man twice his age, whom he met online. He allowed Kharee Louis-Jeune to film them together only to find out later that he had posted the footage to an OnlyFans account. The high-schooler was mortified and changed his appearance, but still the incident haunted him. A classmate asked “if I had been sucking any penises in cars,” he recalled in his court statement. “My heart dropped and he ended up showing me the video.” He met again with the man at 17, to tell him he didn’t want to be touched, and get his license plate number should he need it. Two weeks later Louis-Jeune audaciously taunted him, that his video was popular, sending his OnlyFans link, that’s when the boy broke and went to police. 

Similarly 25-year-old Wyatt Maxwell exploited a 16 year old Kansas boy. Netting more than $49,000 on OnlyFans alone. Leaving the question, is OnlyFans really doing all they can to protect children, especially when this example alone was a near $10,000 profit for them.

Zero financial incentive to stamp out child porn.

Clearly, the criminal doesn’t and shouldn’t have access to the funds. But it’s proven to be difficult to locate the information as to who eventually gets the money earned from CSAM, Should OnlyFans be keeping the money, when someone gets arrested. they would be holding 100% instead of their customary 20%. So there are no financial reasons to take quick action. On the other hand, should law enforcement, or another government agency, be seizing the funds, then there’s little desire to stop children being raped on camera. – The expression “follow the money” holds true and when the money trail is difficult to follow, it’s sure sign that politics and wealthy people are the benefactors.

Charlie Biggs, a legacy porn industry pornographer, once said; “Say what you want about the Traci Lords scandal, she still got paid.” – Whatever funds or resources the government might make available to the victims, the fact is that they worked /suffered for the money and they should be the ones who receive it. They’re going to have years or even decades of trauma to deal with and they’re the only people who have a moral claim to the funds. On the other hand, OnlyFans should face fierce fines and its executive officers held criminally accountable.

In fact, one of the greatest complaints is that, even after something is flagged or reported, the account continues to function. Matthew Richardson aka OnlyFans Skylar Ravenwood uploaded content of his sexual exploits with a 16 year old back in 2022. He was arrested with the girl a month later. Footage of the minor was removed with his incarceration. But despite a blatant breech of OnlyFans rules, his account remained active for a year and a half. 17 extra months of journalist and curious folk, due to the press concerning his arrest, calling up an account that should have been torn down. 17 months of potential profit to OnlyFANS.

Sometimes it’s the out of control teens who self exploit. Take for instance Maryland teen, Monie Graham, she readily admits to having beat OnlyFans vetting process not once but twice as a minor. Her first account was created using someone else’s ID. Her mother had it shut down, but it wasn’t easy, as her complaints to OnlyFans seemed to fall on deaf ears. Finally weeks later when she was able to get the help of the FBI and a county investigator, the site co-operated. But her daughter was not about to lose a money source and simply asked her Instagram followers, if anyone had an account that they weren’t using. Within no time, she was back at it. Graham, now a legal adult ran into trouble when CSAM investigator Matt Richardson (no relation to Skylar mentioned above), discovered that her legal-age account contained content that still held the watermark of her dismantled minor profile. He reported the illegal content to NCMEC and OnlyFans shut down her account.

Sexualization of children has long-term negative effects on the psychological development of kids.  With the rise of AI, new legislation is being written to go after generated content of minors, as it’s existence normalizes child abuse as well as making it harder to rescue real victims. Complaints and investigations have led to a global effort to align legislation against CSAM. But as with Monie Graham, often times the fast easy money is too much temptation to worry about long-term effects or consequences.

OnlyFans became a household name during the pandemic lockups, synonymous with porn and online sex. They are the giant, and they dwarf their competition. That is because it plays both sides of the fence. Nobody sees OnlyFans profiles without regular social media to drive traffic. Similar less prolific fan platforms are banned from most social media. On Instragram, where OnlyFans links are allowed. Minor Attracted Persons (MAP), aka pedophiles, are masturbating to your innocent family photos. MAPs are able to click on an innocent cutie that leads to an Onlyfans account of suggestive photos, which in turn, offers links to VIP secondary accounts for the harder core porn… Both legal and illegal.

In 2021 when it first became evident that OnlyFans was being exploited to distribute CSAM, then CEO and creator Tim Stokely, banned adult. The abrupt ban, said to appease share holders was short lived and Stokely subsequently stepped down from his position. Having sold all his shares to Fenix International Ltd. , Stokely has done his best to distance himself, from the ever expanding platform that he started.

Current owner Leonid Radvinsky was still an underage minor when he launched his first online porn company, Cybertania Inc. Successfully starting and managing an online porn company is difficult enough for experienced adult businessmen and pornographers. Therefore, it’s no surprise that 17 year old Leonid Radvinsky had help from his mother, Anna Radvinsky who was listed as the company president. – Logically given this information, the majority of people will be asking; “ How old was Leonid Radvinsky when he was first given access to pornography?” And, “Was he ever sexually abused or groomed by his parents ?”

A Forbes investigation into Cybertania inc., exposed how a teenaged Radvinsky made millions with a shady empire of websites which advertised access to illegal porn and hacked passwords. Today’s older Leonid Radvinsky has already personally profited more than a billion dollars since buying OnlyFans. Given his history, earning money from CSAM might not pose any moral problems for him. Unfortunately, his past also means there might be a possibility that the unhindered proliferation of minors on OnlyFans happens for reasons that do not involve money.

RE: Consenting Adults

Man arrested after uploading pornographic images of a minor

by

The post OnlyFans and Child Porn appeared first on Steele Hard.

Male Sex Workers suffer abuse and hatred just like their female counterparts.

Beau, a gigolo and French pornstar almost died from injuries he suffered at the hands of a client. A married woman in her 50s, had used his services for a little more than 2 years. He describes their relationship as very amicable and nothing sexually perverse. Her reasons for using his services seemed to be something other than purely sexual, she wanted the attention and to be made to feel that she was desired. The 20 year difference in age between Beau and herself only seemed to make their meetings more special.

But all that changed when unknown to Beau, her husband had left her for a much younger woman. Their ensuing encounter, started with conversation over a glass of wine, a casual exchange that demonstrated a familiarity and comfort level. However, she had spiked Beau’s drink with Roofies (Rohypnol). She then proceeded to unleash her jilted fury on the man before her, cutting and burning his penis and inserting spoons and forks in his anus. When she was satisfied with what she had done, she had somehow got Beau into her car and drove him the bois de Vincennes where she left him at the park’s entrance.

He was found by a firefighter walking his dog who realized something was wrong and called for an ambulance. Beau was taken to the hospital and it was discovered that 2 dinner forks were still inside of him. Hospital staff were professional, seeking only to render assistance, whereas everyone associated with helping rape victims were accusatory. His sexual orientation was recorded as gay despite his insistence that he wasn’t. He was also questioned about his drug use, he was sober accept for the Roofies. Finally, when it became known that was a pornstar, everyone lost interest in him, with few openly saying he probably got hurt in a porn shoot gone wrong.

Sex work is still work.

Sex work has long been a contentious issue, with debates centered on its legality, morality, and the impact it has on individuals and society. In recent years, sex worker advocacy groups have emerged to fight for the rights and protection of sex workers, often focusing on the experiences of female sex workers. However, male sex workers are marginalized and ignored within these organizations, leaving them vulnerable to abuse, discrimination, and violence. The argument many associated with these groups make is that male sex workers exist in very small numbers and that their focus is on trying to help the largest number of people possible. Perhaps Beau had said it best, “This is classic feminist hypocrisy. Only women can be victimized.”

No one has ever done any adequate research and there’s almost no interest to investigate what percentage of men are prostitutes compared to that of women. Literally in a textbook in academic circles, male prostitution is estimated at 10 to 54 % of the sex worker population. (Allman 1999). A variation that is too large to be taken seriously accept to show that nobody really knows the reality of the situation. Andrew Fogg (2017) writing for Medium noted that 42% of the prostitution ads on Adultwork were males, yet organizations and governments consider 20% a generous estimate when factoring resources.

A large portion of male prostitutes begin as strippers or porn talent, so they are able to use more direct tactics, such as word of mouth, to ply their trade. Male sex workers agree that they exist in much larger number than what’s generally believed and in last decade, male prostitution has been growing. The secrecy is the result of a 3 fold problem.

• (1.) The women and couples who use their services demand much greater discretion.
• (2.) The majority of men chose to be silent about being raped because of public mockery.
• (3.) When they do attempt to speak up about being sexually assaulted, they face possible double victimization. Men are frequently accused by the police and support groups of being the rapist, trying to conceal their crime by pretending to be the victim.

Male prostitutes either know or quickly learn that, given the popular prejudices against them, it’s safer to accept what has been done to them and not speak about it to anyone. It’s a brutal reality, taunted by the anti-rape slogan “Believe every woman”; because no one is saying, “Believe every victim.”

Sex worker advocacy groups and victim resources tend to focus solely on “the weaker sex” with the argument that they have historically faced greater violence. (Budd et al., 2019). Considering the current conditions which say “no man should be believed” and that men can only be assailants and never victims, then perhaps it’s time to question historical accuracy. Today everyone knows that history is written by the winners which logically means that male victims of sexual assault are among history’s ultimate losers.

In 2024 there is a growing acknowledgment of diverse gender identities. Group identity politics dominate the government, the media and academia. The overwhelming problem with this is that the traditional male identity is considered the evil patriarchy and blamed for all problems. It’s therefore unfortunate that old biases against men, rampant within the sex work industry, perpetuate the invisibility of male sex workers (Budd et al., 2019). Additionally, the sex worker rights movement are linked to the broader fight for women’s and LGBTQ+ rights, further contributing to the marginalization of male sex workers (Sanders, 2018).

The calls for inclusive advocacy continue to be very elusive when the discussion turns to men. Male sex workers face increased risks of violence, abuse, and exploitation due to their invisibility within advocacy groups (Budd et al., 2019). They may also struggle to access essential health services, such as HIV prevention and treatment, as these services are often tailored to the needs of those who present female (World Health Organization, 2019).

Assaulting a male sex worker should not be more acceptable.

After organizing a sex event, the client paid for the male sex worker’s ride home. The driver recognized the man from his work as a porn-star and asked for oral sex. When he politely declined his offer with a comment that he was tired and not mentally prepared for a male-to-male physical encounter. The driver became hostile and sprayed his passenger with what appeared to be bear spray. He was kicked out of the vehicle and left stranded, at apx 3:30am, several miles from populace. To this day, the ride sharing service has never followed up correspondences. Lawyers have been either quick money shysters or very reluctant to take the case without steep financial reimbursement. Law enforcement is obviously also, not an option – The author (me) of this article is the victim in this case

References

Allman Dan. (1999) M is for Mutual, A is for Acts: Male Sex Work and AIDS in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto, HIV Social, Behavioural and Epidemiological Studies Unit

Bimbi David S. (2007) Male Prostitution: Pathology, Paradigms and Progress in Research. Journal of Homosexuality. 53(1–2):7–35.

Budd, J., Bell, B., & Campbell, R. (2019). Understanding and responding to the sexual health needs of men who sell sex: A review of the literature. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 95(7), 482-487.

Fogg, A. (2014). <Gender differences amongst sex workers online | by Andrew Fogg | Medium>

Sanders, T. (2018). Sex work, gender and the politics of inequality. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 10(2), 209-229.

World Health Organization. (2019). <HIV and Sex Workers>

by

The post Male Sex Workers are Marginalized appeared first on Steele Hard.